475
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Experimental, regression learner, numerical, and artificial neural network analyses on a complex composite structure subjected to compression loading

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2437-2453 | Received 04 Nov 2020, Accepted 10 Dec 2020, Published online: 15 Jan 2021
 

Abstract

This paper reports on an investigation into the relationship between stiffness and applied force of an advanced biological composite structure using four techniques: experimental observation; finite element analysis (FEA); regression learner analysis; and, artificial neural networks (ANNs). The entire hydrated third metacarpal bones (MC3) from 16 thoroughbred horses were loaded in compression in an MTS machine. The stiffness was then determined from the applied force, MC3 displacement, and load exposure time. A variety of mathematical functions were fitted to the sample data points using MATLAB to demonstrate force-dependent stiffness. Two functions were found that exhibited a strong correlation between force and stiffness (R2 = 0.75). Additionally, a power function was found that demonstrated a stronger correlation between the stiffness and force (R2 = 0.81) if the exposure time was also incorporated. FEA considered the calculated force-dependent stiffness when assigning material properties. FEA results were compared with experimental data (for verification and validation), and a good agreement was found for the displacement (RMSE = 0.032 mm) and strain (RMSE = 61.85 με). Machine learning regression models were also employed to predict the stiffness of this complex structure. Applied force, exposure time, MC3 geometry (length and area of cross sections), and age were defined as the independent variables. The regression learner offered excellent reliability (R2 = 0.98) for the prediction of stiffness. Also, feedforward back-propagation artificial neural networks were employed to improve and generalize the stiffness prediction ability to a wider population. ANN regression analysis showed R = 0.992 for training, R = 0.99 for testing, and R = 0.991 for the all datasets. To confirm its accuracy, the ANN was used to predict stiffness of specific samples that were not used in its training. This offered excellent reliability in predicting real-world data that ANNs have not seen before (R = 0.976).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 423.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.