Figures & data
Figure 1. A: Appearance of the retroperitoneal liposarcoma as a giant mass. B: At surgery, well-encapsulated tumor and its exact supplying vessels were found. C: Gross appearance of resected tumor, measuring 65 × 45 × 30 cm and weighting 31 kg. D: The cut section of the specimen, showing a homogenous, yellow look.
![Figure 1. A: Appearance of the retroperitoneal liposarcoma as a giant mass. B: At surgery, well-encapsulated tumor and its exact supplying vessels were found. C: Gross appearance of resected tumor, measuring 65 × 45 × 30 cm and weighting 31 kg. D: The cut section of the specimen, showing a homogenous, yellow look.](/cms/asset/066263a3-8013-4d26-aca4-ebd372a7e39d/kcbt_a_1345388_f0001_oc.gif)
Figure 2. A and B: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) shows a heterogeneous retroperitoneal mass occupying the entire abdominal cavity, with stomach being pushed aside (red arrow). C and D: The 3-month follow-up CT scan, with the normal stomach (red arrow).
![Figure 2. A and B: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) shows a heterogeneous retroperitoneal mass occupying the entire abdominal cavity, with stomach being pushed aside (red arrow). C and D: The 3-month follow-up CT scan, with the normal stomach (red arrow).](/cms/asset/e3b43229-594a-4ed6-b873-315895644c24/kcbt_a_1345388_f0002_oc.gif)
Figure 3. Histopathologic findings. A (original magnification, × 40; hematoxylin and eosin staining) and B (original magnification, × 100; hematoxylin and eosin staining) views demonstrate a well-differentiated liposarcoma.
![Figure 3. Histopathologic findings. A (original magnification, × 40; hematoxylin and eosin staining) and B (original magnification, × 100; hematoxylin and eosin staining) views demonstrate a well-differentiated liposarcoma.](/cms/asset/1ad71fa3-6d23-4bcc-b36d-0db0279ca87d/kcbt_a_1345388_f0003_oc.gif)
Table 1. Clinical features, preoperative evaluation, type of therapeutic approach, histopathologic characteristics at diagnosis, follow-up and clinical outcomes of 14 patients with giant RPLS.