1,149
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REPORT

Gamma-actin is involved in regulating centrosome function and mitotic progression in cancer cells

&
Pages 3908-3919 | Received 17 Jun 2015, Accepted 12 Nov 2015, Published online: 23 Dec 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of β-actin and γ-actin in different mitotic phases. Confocal images of SH-EP cells transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA in interphase (A and B), prometaphase (C and D), metaphase (E and F), anaphase (G and H) and telophase (I and J). The cells were dual stained for β-actin (green) or γ-actin (red). Confocal images show maximum projections and images were acquired using the same settings and process exactly the same using the ZEN software. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of β-actin and γ-actin in different mitotic phases. Confocal images of SH-EP cells transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA in interphase (A and B), prometaphase (C and D), metaphase (E and F), anaphase (G and H) and telophase (I and J). The cells were dual stained for β-actin (green) or γ-actin (red). Confocal images show maximum projections and images were acquired using the same settings and process exactly the same using the ZEN software. Scale bar, 5 µm.

Figure 2. Aberrant expression of cell cycle markers in the γ-actin-depleted cells. The SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells were transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA and treated with 0–10 nM paclitaxel for 22 or 70 h to investigate the cell cycle. Aliquots of the cells were taken for flow cytometry to confirm that paclitaxel induces G2/M cell cycle checkpoint and the rest of the cells were lysed for western blot analysis. (A) Cell cycle analysis of the control and γ-actin siRNA transfectants treated with 0–10 nM paclitaxel for either 22 or 70 h. (B) Representative western blot analyses showing the expression of several cell cycle markers, cyclin A, cyclin B1, cylin D1, cyclin E and securin, in control and γ-actin siRNA transfected cells. γ-Actin was included to confirm γ-actin knockdown and GAPDH was included as a control for equal loading. Graphs showing the relative expression of cyclin D1 (C) and cyclin E (D) in control and γ-actin siRNA transfected cells. Data are mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug free γ-actin siRNA cells and drug free control siRNA cells or between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells.

Figure 2. Aberrant expression of cell cycle markers in the γ-actin-depleted cells. The SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells were transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA and treated with 0–10 nM paclitaxel for 22 or 70 h to investigate the cell cycle. Aliquots of the cells were taken for flow cytometry to confirm that paclitaxel induces G2/M cell cycle checkpoint and the rest of the cells were lysed for western blot analysis. (A) Cell cycle analysis of the control and γ-actin siRNA transfectants treated with 0–10 nM paclitaxel for either 22 or 70 h. (B) Representative western blot analyses showing the expression of several cell cycle markers, cyclin A, cyclin B1, cylin D1, cyclin E and securin, in control and γ-actin siRNA transfected cells. γ-Actin was included to confirm γ-actin knockdown and GAPDH was included as a control for equal loading. Graphs showing the relative expression of cyclin D1 (C) and cyclin E (D) in control and γ-actin siRNA transfected cells. Data are mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug free γ-actin siRNA cells and drug free control siRNA cells or between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells.

Figure 3. Decreased expression of cleaved PARP in paclitaxel-treated γ-actin-depleted cells. Western blotting analysis of cleaved PARP expression performed on lysates from SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin siRNA transfected cells, treated with 0–500 nM paclitaxel for 48 h to induce cell death, following either 48 (A) or 72 h (B) siRNA transfection. Both floating and adherence cells were collected for western blot analysis. GAPDH was included as a control for equal loading. Graphs represent the fold change in cleaved PARP expression. Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 3. Decreased expression of cleaved PARP in paclitaxel-treated γ-actin-depleted cells. Western blotting analysis of cleaved PARP expression performed on lysates from SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin siRNA transfected cells, treated with 0–500 nM paclitaxel for 48 h to induce cell death, following either 48 (A) or 72 h (B) siRNA transfection. Both floating and adherence cells were collected for western blot analysis. GAPDH was included as a control for equal loading. Graphs represent the fold change in cleaved PARP expression. Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 4. Inhibition of Eg5 inhibitor III, dimethylenastron, induced G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in the γ-actin knockdown cells. Cell cycle analysis of SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells transfected with either control (A) or γ-actin siRNA (B) and treated with 0–2 µM dimethylenastron for either 22 h (A(i) and B(i)) or 70 h (A(ii) and B(ii)). Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.*P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in G0/G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases. P < 0 .05, ≠≠P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in S phase. xP < 0 .05, xxP < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in sub-G1.

Figure 4. Inhibition of Eg5 inhibitor III, dimethylenastron, induced G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in the γ-actin knockdown cells. Cell cycle analysis of SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells transfected with either control (A) or γ-actin siRNA (B) and treated with 0–2 µM dimethylenastron for either 22 h (A(i) and B(i)) or 70 h (A(ii) and B(ii)). Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.*P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in G0/G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases. ≠P < 0 .05, ≠≠P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in S phase. xP < 0 .05, xxP < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in sub-G1.

Figure 5. Partial depletion of γ-actin inhibits Aurora kinase A inhibitor, MLN8273, induced G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in SH-EP cells. Cell cycle distribution in SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells transfected with either the control (A) or γ-actin siRNA (B) then treated with increasing concentrations of MLN8237, for either 22 (A(i) and B(i)) or 70 h (A(ii) and B(ii)). Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.*P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in G0/G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases. P < 0 .05, ≠≠P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in S phase. *P < 0 .05, **P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in sub-G1.

Figure 5. Partial depletion of γ-actin inhibits Aurora kinase A inhibitor, MLN8273, induced G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in SH-EP cells. Cell cycle distribution in SH-EP GFP-β-Itubulin cells transfected with either the control (A) or γ-actin siRNA (B) then treated with increasing concentrations of MLN8237, for either 22 (A(i) and B(i)) or 70 h (A(ii) and B(ii)). Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments.*P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in G0/G1 and G2/M cell cycle phases. ≠P < 0 .05, ≠≠P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in S phase. *P < 0 .05, **P < 0 .005, statistically significant between the drug treated cells and its corresponding drug free cells in sub-G1.

Figure 6. Enhanced centrosome amplification in cancer cells due to γ-actin depletion. Quantification of centrosome numbers in the control and γ-actin siRNA transfected SH-EP (A), MCF-7 (B) and MRC-5 cells (C) were analyzed by co-staining the cells with γ-tubulin and α-tubulin. Confocal images were acquired and then centrosome number was scored in interphase cells as 1, 2 or more than 2 centrosomes. n = the total number of interphase cells analyzed from 4 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 6. Enhanced centrosome amplification in cancer cells due to γ-actin depletion. Quantification of centrosome numbers in the control and γ-actin siRNA transfected SH-EP (A), MCF-7 (B) and MRC-5 cells (C) were analyzed by co-staining the cells with γ-tubulin and α-tubulin. Confocal images were acquired and then centrosome number was scored in interphase cells as 1, 2 or more than 2 centrosomes. n = the total number of interphase cells analyzed from 4 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 7. Partial depletion of γ-actin induces mitotic defects. (A) Still images from movies in Supplemental Movie 1 and 2, showing SH-EP mCherry-histone-H2B expressing cells transfected with the control siRNA (top panels) undergoing normal mitosis or with the γ-actin siRNA (bottom panels) undergoing abnormal mitosis. Arrows showing uncongressed chromosomes. Time is in h:min:s; Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) A scatter plot showing the duration for prometaphase/metaphase in the control and γ-actin depleted cells, which was measured from nuclear envelope breakdown to the beginning of anaphase. n = the total number of mitotic cells undergoing mitosis analyzed from 3 independent experiments. #Control siRNA cells have more than 203 mitotic cells, however, we only analyzed 203 mitotic cells due to fewer mitotic cells in the γ-actin siRNA cells. Therefore the actual percentage of mitotic abnormalities for the control siRNA cells is lower than 8.37%. #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 7. Partial depletion of γ-actin induces mitotic defects. (A) Still images from movies in Supplemental Movie 1 and 2, showing SH-EP mCherry-histone-H2B expressing cells transfected with the control siRNA (top panels) undergoing normal mitosis or with the γ-actin siRNA (bottom panels) undergoing abnormal mitosis. Arrows showing uncongressed chromosomes. Time is in h:min:s; Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) A scatter plot showing the duration for prometaphase/metaphase in the control and γ-actin depleted cells, which was measured from nuclear envelope breakdown to the beginning of anaphase. n = the total number of mitotic cells undergoing mitosis analyzed from 3 independent experiments. #Control siRNA cells have more than 203 mitotic cells, however, we only analyzed 203 mitotic cells due to fewer mitotic cells in the γ-actin siRNA cells. Therefore the actual percentage of mitotic abnormalities for the control siRNA cells is lower than 8.37%. #P < 0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 8. Increased formation of abnormal mitotic spindles in the γ-actin knockdown cells. (A) Confocal images of normal mitotic spindles in control siRNA SH-EP cells (i-ii) and abnormal mitotic spindles in γ-actin siRNA SH-EP cells (iii-v). Cells were stained with α-tubulin to visualize the mitotic spindles and counterstained with DAPI to visualize the chromosomes. Arrows in (iii) shows uncongressed chromosomes in metaphase and arrow in (v) shows anaphase bridge. Confocal images show maximum projections. Scale bar, 5 µm. Quantification of abnormal spindle mitoses in SH-EP (B) and MCF-7 (C) cells transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA. The types of mitotic cells that were counted include prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase. n=the total number of mitotic cells analyzed per condition. Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P <0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.

Figure 8. Increased formation of abnormal mitotic spindles in the γ-actin knockdown cells. (A) Confocal images of normal mitotic spindles in control siRNA SH-EP cells (i-ii) and abnormal mitotic spindles in γ-actin siRNA SH-EP cells (iii-v). Cells were stained with α-tubulin to visualize the mitotic spindles and counterstained with DAPI to visualize the chromosomes. Arrows in (iii) shows uncongressed chromosomes in metaphase and arrow in (v) shows anaphase bridge. Confocal images show maximum projections. Scale bar, 5 µm. Quantification of abnormal spindle mitoses in SH-EP (B) and MCF-7 (C) cells transfected with either the control or γ-actin siRNA. The types of mitotic cells that were counted include prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase. n=the total number of mitotic cells analyzed per condition. Data are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0 .05, #P <0 .005, statistically significant when comparing the γ-actin siRNA cells to the control siRNA cells.
Supplemental material

Supplemental_material.zip

Download Zip (3.3 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.