4,843
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Estimated Injury Risk for Specific Injuries and Body Regions in Frontal Motor Vehicle Crashes

, , , , &
Pages S108-S116 | Received 14 Nov 2014, Accepted 24 Jan 2015, Published online: 01 Jun 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 List of the injury risk curves produced for specific body regions and the injury risk model coefficients (α, β1, β2). The unweighted (NU) and weighted (NW) sample sizes, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), P value for belt status, and estimated risk at a 56 km/h longitudinal delta-V is provided for belted versus unbelted cases. For each risk curve, the higher injury risk at 56 km/h longitudinal delta-V between belted and unbelted occupants is bolded

Figure 1 Weighted injury count and cumulative percent for the top 50% of AIS 2+ injuries in NASS-CDS 2000–2011. On the x-axis, there are 33 injuries that make up the top 50% of AIS 2+ injuries in NASS-CDS 2000–2011 and these are ranked in descending order in terms of weighted frequency.
Figure 1 Weighted injury count and cumulative percent for the top 50% of AIS 2+ injuries in NASS-CDS 2000–2011. On the x-axis, there are 33 injuries that make up the top 50% of AIS 2+ injuries in NASS-CDS 2000–2011 and these are ranked in descending order in terms of weighted frequency.
Figure 2 Injury risk curves with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for select injuries: cerebrum subarachnoid hemorrhage, unilateral lung contusion, clavicle fracture, and patella fracture. Injury risk is plotted versus longitudinal delta-V (km/h) and stratified by belt status.
Figure 2 Injury risk curves with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for select injuries: cerebrum subarachnoid hemorrhage, unilateral lung contusion, clavicle fracture, and patella fracture. Injury risk is plotted versus longitudinal delta-V (km/h) and stratified by belt status.
Figure 3 Risk at 56 km/h longitudinal delta-V for (a) specific injuries and (b) specific body regions plotted versus the weighted injury count in NASS-CDS and stratified by belt status and AIS severity.
Figure 3 Risk at 56 km/h longitudinal delta-V for (a) specific injuries and (b) specific body regions plotted versus the weighted injury count in NASS-CDS and stratified by belt status and AIS severity.
Figure 4 AIS 2+ injury risk curves with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the head, face, thorax, abdomen, spine, upper extremity, and lower extremity. Injury risk is plotted versus longitudinal delta-V (km/h) and stratified by belt status.
Figure 4 AIS 2+ injury risk curves with 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) for the head, face, thorax, abdomen, spine, upper extremity, and lower extremity. Injury risk is plotted versus longitudinal delta-V (km/h) and stratified by belt status.
Supplemental material