1,832
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Toward harmonizing prospective effectiveness assessment for road safety: Comparing tools in standard test case simulations

, , , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages S139-S145 | Received 09 Nov 2018, Accepted 02 May 2019, Published online: 05 Aug 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Simplified flow diagram of the investigated safety system.

Figure 1. Simplified flow diagram of the investigated safety system.

Table 1. Percentage of test cases where all participants had same results (either true for all events cyclist detected, algorithm fired, and collision avoided).

Table 2. Minimal, maximal, mean, median and range values of detection rate, firing rate, avoidance rate and average speed reduction for all sensor setups and participants.

Table 3. Minimal, maximal, and range (maximum-minimum) values of the results of the flow of actions–based analysis. “Firing” relates to the moment where TTC falls below the threshold.

Figure 2. Variable definitions used for different TTC calculation methods. The left side shows a collision configuration with the hit-point in the middle of the car. The right side shows a collision configuration with a lateral offset between hit-point and middle of the car, where (Eq. 8) underestimates the TTC.

Figure 2. Variable definitions used for different TTC calculation methods. The left side shows a collision configuration with the hit-point in the middle of the car. The right side shows a collision configuration with a lateral offset between hit-point and middle of the car, where (Eq. 8) underestimates the TTC.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (1.4 MB)