On the evaluation of visual nudges to promote safe cycling: Can we encourage lower speeds at intersections?

Figures & data

Figure 1. An example of the cyclist tracks as processed from the Viscando system for location 1 (left) and location 2 (right).

Figure 2. Distribution of cyclist speed at different positions and conditions for location 1 (top) and location 2 (bottom). The numbers on the top report the sample size for each boxplot.

Table 1. Summary of ANOVA results for location 1 and location 2 for factors condition and position.

		F	p	ηp^2
Location 1	Condition	82.04	<.001	0.019
	Position	297.89	<.001	0.064
	Condition × Position	17.12	<.001	0.008
Location 2	Condition	267.30	<.001	0.033
	Position	1802.47	<.001	0.317
	Condition × Position	18.85	<.001	0.005

Statistically significant effects in boldface.

Table 2. Summary of ANOVA results for location 1 and location 2 for factors condition and wind (wind threshold = 1 km/h).

		F	p	ηp^2
Location 1	Condition	2.46	0.08	0.002
	Wind	3.66	0.03	0.003
	Condition × Wind	0.75	0.56	0.001
Location 2	Condition	1.07	0.30	<.001
	Wind	16.42	<.001	0.013
	Condition × Wind	0.42	0.66	<.001

Statistically significant effects in boldface.

Data availability statement

The data in this study are not publicly available.