Aberrant driving behaviors as mediators in the relationship between driving anger patterns and crashes among taxi drivers: An investigation in a complex cultural context

Figures & data

Figure 1. SEM Model with direct and indirect causal relationships.

Table 1. CA, CR, AVE and Fornell-Larcker criterion for DAS factor.

Factor	Mean (SD)	CA (CR)	AVE	DC	TO	HG	ID
DC	2.09 (0.96)	0.86 (0.89)	0.66	0.81
TO	1.99 (0.92)	0.85 (0.90)	0.69	0.17	0.83
HG	2.02 (0.91)	0.85 (0.91)	0.77	0.16	0.22	0.87
ID	1.80 (1.04)	0.61 (0.74)	0.51	0.12	0.28	0.22	0.71

Table 2. Cronbach’s alpha, CR, AVE and Fornell-Larcker criterion for the DBQ factor.

Factor	Mean (SD)	CA (CR)	AVE	OV	E	L	AV
OV	1.47 (1.01)	0.98 (0.98)	0.81	0.90
E	1.46 (0.99)	0.97 (0.98)	0.83	0.23	0.91
L	1.43 (0.91)	0.97 (0.97)	0.86	0.18	0.29	0.93
AV	1.50 (0.89)	0.93 (0.96)	0.88	0.12	0.26	0.31	0.94′

Table 3. Path analysis.

Effect Type	Path	β	STDEV	T values	P values	Bootstrapping Confidence interval
						2.5%	97.5
Direct Effect	ID -> OV	0.21	0.06	3.85	<.01	0.105	0.320
	ID -> E	0.23	0.06	4.15	<.01	0.126	0.333
	ID -> L	0.13	0.06	2.03	0.04	0.004	0.249
	ID -> AV	0.20	0.06	3.46	<.01	0.074	0.298
	HG -> L	0.11	0.06	1.98	0.04	−0.007	0.211
	E -> Crash	0.11	0.05	2.02	0.04	0.014	0.211
	Exp -> Crash	−0.21	0.06	3.46	<.01	−0.324	−0.101
	Age -> Crash	0.13	0.06	2.20	0.03	0.020	0.250
Indirect Effect	ID -> Crash	0.05	0.02	2.51	0.01	0.014	0.093