485
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Dynamic visualization by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: a meta-analysis of 20 years of research

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Received 31 Mar 2023, Accepted 18 Aug 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023
 

Abstract

GeoGebra is an open-source software package for supporting mathematics teaching and learning. It enables a dynamic visualization approach that is beneficial for students’ mathematics learning. However, few studies comprehensively investigate the effectiveness of GeoGebra as a scaffolding tool to achieve dynamic visualization in mathematics since its release. To fill this gap, we carried out a meta-analysis of studies examining the use of GeoGebra software for students’ mathematics achievement since it was initially published in 2002 until 2022. Nineteen effect sizes were synthesized from fourteen studies in the last two decades, with a total of 1,334 participants. The analysis results demonstrated a positive medium-to-large effect (Hedges’s g = 0.653) of GeoGebra as a dynamic visualization tool for improving students’ mathematics achievement. Topic, treatment duration, and sample size were significant moderators of the effect size, suggesting that GeoGebra as a scaffolding for dynamic visualization is more effective when implemented with fewer participants (i.e. less than 50), for a short period (i.e. within four weeks), and in the topics of calculus and geometry than other conditions. Location, grade level, publication year, learning theory, group work, and student operation did not show significant moderating effects. Pedagogical implications of the findings for students, teachers, and educational researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Acknowledgements

We are sincerely grateful to the reviewers and editorial team for the comments that substantially improved the article. We also appreciate the comments provided by Prof. Carol K. K. Chan, Mr. Yang Tao, Dr. Yuyao Tong, and Dr. Liru Hu from the Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Contributorship

Ying Zhang initiated the project, conducted the data analysis, and revised the draft. Pengjin Wang drafted the manuscript. Ying Zhang, Pengjin Wang, and Wei Jia collected and coded the data. Aijun Zhang and Gaowei Chen supervised the study, provided important ideas for the research and revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (Grant No. 17605221).

Notes on contributors

Ying Zhang

Ying Zhang is a PhD candidate in the Faculty of Education at The University of Hong Kong. His research interests address topics in technology-enhanced mathematics education, classroom discourse, teacher professional development, psychometrics, and international large-scale assessments.

Pengjin Wang

Pengjin Wang is a PhD candidate in the Faculty of Education at the University of Hong Kong. His primary research interests include learning sciences, technology-enhanced learning, teacher professional development, and teaching English as a second language.

Wei Jia

Wei Jia is a PhD candidate in the Faculty of Education at The University of Hong Kong. His research interests address topics in technology-enhanced STEM education, classroom discourse, and multiple representations.

Aijun Zhang

Aijun Zhang is with the Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science at the University of Hong Kong. His research interests include experimental design, interpretable machine learning, and educational data mining.

Gaowei Chen

Gaowei Chen is an associate professor at the Faculty of Education, the University of Hong Kong. His research interests cover learning sciences, dialogic teaching and learning, classroom discourse, teacher professional development, video visualization, learning analytics, mathematics education, and educational statistics.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 176.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.