850
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

The Detection of Hamster Connexins: A Comparison of Expression Profiles with Wild-Type Mouse and the Cancer-Prone Min Mouse

, , , , &
Pages 155-171 | Received 25 Aug 2004, Accepted 22 Jun 2005, Published online: 11 Jul 2009

Figures & data

TABLE 1 Overview of Rattus norvegicus connexins detected and sequenced, and their accession numbers in GenBank

TABLE 2 Overview of Mesocricetus auratus connexins and accession numbers in GenBank

TABLE 3 Overview of Cricetulus griseus connexins and their accession numbers in GenBank

TABLE 4 Primer-combinations for screening of connexin expression in Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) organs and cells, V79 cells (Chinese hamster, Cricetulus griseus) and mouse (Mus musculus, Mm) organs

TABLE 5 Expression of connexins in some Syrian hamster organs, SHE cells and V79 cells as detected by RT-PCR

Figure 1 Similarities and differences in connexin expression in hamster and mouse. Expression of (A) Cx29, (B) Cx39, (C) Cx46, and (D) Cx57 in some hamster organs and cells (left panels) and in some mouse organs (right panels). RNA was isolated from several Syrian hamster and mouse organs, Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells, and Chinese hamster V79 cells. The RNA was DNase treated. After removal of DNase, the samples were divided in two. One part was reverse transcribed, the other part was handled similarly but without reverse transcriptase. PCR was then performed on both samples. The upper panels show samples that were reverse transcribed, and the lower panels show the corresponding samples that were not reverse transcribed, indicating the lack of genomic contamination. The positive controls (pos.) are samples that have not been cleaned from genomic contamination. The positions of size markers are indicated to the left.

Figure 1 Similarities and differences in connexin expression in hamster and mouse. Expression of (A) Cx29, (B) Cx39, (C) Cx46, and (D) Cx57 in some hamster organs and cells (left panels) and in some mouse organs (right panels). RNA was isolated from several Syrian hamster and mouse organs, Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells, and Chinese hamster V79 cells. The RNA was DNase treated. After removal of DNase, the samples were divided in two. One part was reverse transcribed, the other part was handled similarly but without reverse transcriptase. PCR was then performed on both samples. The upper panels show samples that were reverse transcribed, and the lower panels show the corresponding samples that were not reverse transcribed, indicating the lack of genomic contamination. The positive controls (pos.) are samples that have not been cleaned from genomic contamination. The positions of size markers are indicated to the left.

TABLE 6 Connexin expression profiles in wild-type and Min mouse as detected by RT-PCR

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.