4,293
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Regulation of Endothelial Cell Adherence and Elastic Modulus by Substrate Stiffness

, , , &
Pages 79-89 | Received 16 Jul 2016, Accepted 24 Nov 2016, Published online: 14 Dec 2016

Figures & data

Table 1. Compositions of soft, medium and hard PAAM hydrogels.

Table 2. Parameters used for SCFS experiments.

Figure 1. A typical force-displacement curve for a SCFS test: approach curve (black) and retract curve (grey). In the approach region, initially there is no cell-surface contact (Approach 1), then the cell meets the bottom of petri dish and squeeze between the cantilever, and dish surface (Approach 2). In the retract part, Retraction 1 contains several information about cell-substrate adhesion, including maximum detachment force, detachment work, and unbinding force of molecular bonds. Finally, there is no more cell-surface contact (Retraction 2).

Figure 1. A typical force-displacement curve for a SCFS test: approach curve (black) and retract curve (grey). In the approach region, initially there is no cell-surface contact (Approach 1), then the cell meets the bottom of petri dish and squeeze between the cantilever, and dish surface (Approach 2). In the retract part, Retraction 1 contains several information about cell-substrate adhesion, including maximum detachment force, detachment work, and unbinding force of molecular bonds. Finally, there is no more cell-surface contact (Retraction 2).

Figure 2. Elastic modulus of soft, medium and hard substrates.

Figure 2. Elastic modulus of soft, medium and hard substrates.

Figure 3. Morphology of cells cultured on (A) soft, (B) medium and (C) hard polyacrylamide substrates after 24 h, and (D) hard substrate after 48 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Figure 3. Morphology of cells cultured on (A) soft, (B) medium and (C) hard polyacrylamide substrates after 24 h, and (D) hard substrate after 48 h. Experiments were performed in triplicate.

Figure 4. Actin staining for (A) soft and (B) hard substrates.

Figure 4. Actin staining for (A) soft and (B) hard substrates.

Figure 5. Cell elasticity and detachment force values corresponding to the soft, medium, and hard polyacrylamide substrates. *, **, and *** indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

Figure 5. Cell elasticity and detachment force values corresponding to the soft, medium, and hard polyacrylamide substrates. *, **, and *** indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

Table 3. Force spectroscopy results for soft, medium, and hard substrates based on 120 SCFS experiments using 11 cells.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.