Multiobjective Optimization of Hydrophobic Process for Performance Analysis of Cover Date Bunch

Figures & data

Table 1. The experimental DOE factorial design.

Std. order	Run order	C	P	S	T (N)	TS (N)	W (g/m2)	A (mm/s)	R (mmH2O)
10	1	35	2	10	20,8	5,356	59	2010	66,3
5	2	20	1,5	10	24,1	2,41	43	2070	63,24
13	3	35	1,5	20	25,5	2,24	44	1910	53,04
2	4	50	1	20	45,6	15,65	62,8	2024	100
6	5	50	1,5	10	27,2	6,18	43	2110	41,82
15	6	35	1,5	20	21,9	17,18	60,2	1998	87,72
4	7	50	2	20	37	8,36	45	1700	79,56
8	8	50	1,5	30	20	9,32	44	1920	75,99
3	9	20	2	20	40,8	16,3	61,8	2130	88,74
7	10	20	1,5	30	22,8	4,47	57,9	2280	76,5
14	11	35	1,5	20	24,2	5,37	58,2	1660	63,24
9	12	35	1	10	10,13	6	56	2160	32,64
1	13	20	1	20	25,2	15,21	60	2030	82,62
11	14	35	1	30	30,2	7,17	57	5920	59,16
12	15	35	2	30	32,2	8,6	43	2920	65,16

Table 2. The ANOVA results for all responses of nonwoven cover bunch.

Response	Analysis of Variance
T(N)	Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Regression 9 867,11 867,109 96,345 1,98 0,234 Linear 3 150,02 150,017 50,006 1,03 0,455 Square 3 543,19 543,187 181,062 3,72 0,096 Interaction 3 173,90 173,905 57,968 1,19 0,402 Residual Error 5 243,58 243,577 48,715 Lack-of-Fit 3 236,93 236,930 78,977 23,76 0,041 Pure Error 2 6,65 6,647 3,323
TS(N)	Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Regression 9 195,45 195,45 21,717 0,67 0,719 Linear 3 15,37 15,37 5,125 0,16 0,921 Square 3 161,16 161,16 53,719 1,65 0,291 Interaction 3 18,92 18,92 6,308 0,19 0,896 Residual Error 5 162,82 162,82 32,564 Lack-of-Fit 3 38,66 38,66 12,887 0,21 0,884 Pure Error 2 124,16 124,16 62,079
W(g/m2)	Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Regression 9 633,9 633,9 70,43 1,26 0,418 Linear 3 188,5 188,5 62,84 1,13 0,421 Square 3 228,7 228,7 76,25 1,37 0,353 Interaction 3 216,6 216,6 72,20 1,30 0,372 Residual Error 5 278,5 278,5 55,70 Lack-of-Fit 3 122,5 122,5 40,83 0,52 0,708 Pure Error 2 156,0 156,0 78,01
A(mm/s)	Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Regression 9 11,173,207 11,173,207 1,241,467 1,62 0,310 Linear 3 4,243,939 4,243,939 1,414,646 1,84 0,256 Square 3 4,813,699 4,813,699 1,604,566 2,09 0,220 Interaction 3 2,115,569 2,115,569 705,190 0,92 0,495 Residual Error 5 3,836,175 3,836,175 767,235 Lack-of-Fit 3 3,774,679 3,774,679 1,258,226 40,92 0,024 Pure Error 2 61,496 61,496 30,748
R(mmH2O)	Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Regression 9 3430,1 3430,1 381,1 1,62 0,308 Linear 3 766,5 766,5 255,5 1,09 0,434 Square 3 2186,7 2186,7 728,9 3,10 0,127 Interaction 3 476,9 476,9 159,0 0,68 0,602 Residual Error 5 1173,8 1173,8 234,8 Lack-of-Fit 3 538,5 538,5 179,5 0,57 0,689 Pure Error 2 635,3 635,3 317,7

Figure 1. Nonwoven bagging product.

Figure 2. Surface plots of tear strength TS.

Figure 3. Surface plots of tensile strength T.

Figure 4. Surface plots of weight W.

Figure 5. Surface plots of air permeability A.

Figure 6. Surface plots of resistance to water penetration R.