Figures & data
Table 1. AFIS length and maturity statistics of locule or lint sample in a DP1646 cultivar.
Figure 1. Percentage difference (%) of mean AFIS length and maturity between lint sample and locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar sorted by the increasing percentage difference.
![Figure 1. Percentage difference (%) of mean AFIS length and maturity between lint sample and locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar sorted by the increasing percentage difference.](/cms/asset/ebbf9755-c8fa-42aa-ac21-b5d52b6d831e/wjnf_a_2356694_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 2. AFIS length and maturity statistics of lint samples in commercial upland cotton cultivars.
Figure 2. Percentage difference (%, lint sample – locule sample) of mean AFIS length and maturity between locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar and lint sample from different cultivars sorted by the increasing percentage difference.
![Figure 2. Percentage difference (%, lint sample – locule sample) of mean AFIS length and maturity between locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar and lint sample from different cultivars sorted by the increasing percentage difference.](/cms/asset/fccd55c4-dee8-4dbb-af65-8986c1077fcf/wjnf_a_2356694_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 3. AFIS length and maturity measurement between locule samples of a cotton cultivar and lint samples of diverse cultivars.
Figure 3. Comparison of L(w) and L(n) measurement between locule samples within a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.
![Figure 3. Comparison of L(w) and L(n) measurement between locule samples within a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.](/cms/asset/0d4780b7-44d9-4583-84b5-e180be2622dd/wjnf_a_2356694_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Comparison of SFC(w) and SFC(n) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.
![Figure 4. Comparison of SFC(w) and SFC(n) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.](/cms/asset/1ded02ef-f5c1-462f-9491-63183eec9221/wjnf_a_2356694_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Comparison of MR and IFC measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.
![Figure 5. Comparison of MR and IFC measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.](/cms/asset/05596430-5eef-4808-a9cb-5e6bc14c99f6/wjnf_a_2356694_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Comparison of MR and L(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.
![Figure 6. Comparison of MR and L(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.](/cms/asset/40a5fef3-1505-4282-9dda-4426766d644d/wjnf_a_2356694_f0006_oc.jpg)
Data availability statement
All data presented in this study are available upon request.