73
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Variability of Fiber AFIS Length and Maturity within and Among Upland Cotton Cultivars

ORCID Icon

Figures & data

Table 1. AFIS length and maturity statistics of locule or lint sample in a DP1646 cultivar.

Figure 1. Percentage difference (%) of mean AFIS length and maturity between lint sample and locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar sorted by the increasing percentage difference.

Figure 1. Percentage difference (%) of mean AFIS length and maturity between lint sample and locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar sorted by the increasing percentage difference.

Table 2. AFIS length and maturity statistics of lint samples in commercial upland cotton cultivars.

Figure 2. Percentage difference (%, lint sample – locule sample) of mean AFIS length and maturity between locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar and lint sample from different cultivars sorted by the increasing percentage difference.

Figure 2. Percentage difference (%, lint sample – locule sample) of mean AFIS length and maturity between locule sample in a DP1646 cultivar and lint sample from different cultivars sorted by the increasing percentage difference.

Table 3. AFIS length and maturity measurement between locule samples of a cotton cultivar and lint samples of diverse cultivars.

Figure 3. Comparison of L(w) and L(n) measurement between locule samples within a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 3. Comparison of L(w) and L(n) measurement between locule samples within a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 4. Comparison of SFC(w) and SFC(n) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 4. Comparison of SFC(w) and SFC(n) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 5. Comparison of MR and IFC measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 5. Comparison of MR and IFC measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 6. Comparison of MR and L(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 6. Comparison of MR and L(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 7. Comparison of MR and SFC(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Figure 7. Comparison of MR and SFC(w) measurement between locule samples in a DP1646 cultivar and lint samples from different cultivars.

Data availability statement

All data presented in this study are available upon request.