Figures & data
Table 1. Percentage of individual lengths of flax and hemp shives in the mass of the sample.
Table 2. Salt solutions and relative humidity (according to ISO 12,571:2021).
Figure 2. Capillary rise test stand (a), and Arrangement of the shives relative to the water table (b).
![Figure 2. Capillary rise test stand (a), and Arrangement of the shives relative to the water table (b).](/cms/asset/34111832-1e60-4a9e-a7e4-cf47f80b1793/wjnf_a_2356695_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Capillary rise of three specimens of hemp shives (a), and flax shives (b) samples over time.
![Figure 4. Capillary rise of three specimens of hemp shives (a), and flax shives (b) samples over time.](/cms/asset/162d5b26-3288-464d-9fed-1696c4c317b4/wjnf_a_2356695_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Range of the water raised up in flax shives (a) sample after 48 h of testing, and hemp shives (b) sample after 70 h of testing.
![Figure 5. Range of the water raised up in flax shives (a) sample after 48 h of testing, and hemp shives (b) sample after 70 h of testing.](/cms/asset/f04e27fc-abf9-41a8-a8f1-8ab8d4555e27/wjnf_a_2356695_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Material properties determined during the MIP analysis.
Table 4. Chemical composition of the shives.
Figure 8. Cross-section through flax (a, c) and hemp (b, d) shives, magnification 120× (a, b), 1000× (c, d).
![Figure 8. Cross-section through flax (a, c) and hemp (b, d) shives, magnification 120× (a, b), 1000× (c, d).](/cms/asset/68496b8a-d68a-4404-a894-e4047fdebcd1/wjnf_a_2356695_f0008_b.gif)
Figure 10. Colonies of filamentous fungi grown on Rose-Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar (RBC) medium from flax shives (a) and hemp shives (b).
![Figure 10. Colonies of filamentous fungi grown on Rose-Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar (RBC) medium from flax shives (a) and hemp shives (b).](/cms/asset/71c43484-bbde-4937-b58a-764ea550cba5/wjnf_a_2356695_f0010_oc.jpg)
Figure 11. Microscopic views (x100) of Aspergillus flavus conidiophores isolated from flax shives samples.
![Figure 11. Microscopic views (x100) of Aspergillus flavus conidiophores isolated from flax shives samples.](/cms/asset/e614de19-316c-4c4b-a875-4c2b734f3d38/wjnf_a_2356695_f0011_oc.jpg)
Table 5. Minimal thickness of loose-fill insulation made of HS or FS to achieve required U-value of building element (according to ISO 6946).
Figure 16. Climate conditions and model for simulation: (a) relative humidity and (b) temperature for Olsztyn, based on Typical Meteorological Year (c) internal temperature and relative humidity, (d) cross section of the wall: 1) cement-lime plaster, external (10 mm); 2) mineral wool (150 mm); 3) glue mortar (5 mm); 4) ceramic brick wall (250 mm); 5) glue mortar (5 mm); 6) gypsum plaster/shives layer, internal (3 mm).
![Figure 16. Climate conditions and model for simulation: (a) relative humidity and (b) temperature for Olsztyn, based on Typical Meteorological Year (c) internal temperature and relative humidity, (d) cross section of the wall: 1) cement-lime plaster, external (10 mm); 2) mineral wool (150 mm); 3) glue mortar (5 mm); 4) ceramic brick wall (250 mm); 5) glue mortar (5 mm); 6) gypsum plaster/shives layer, internal (3 mm).](/cms/asset/df622cbb-7151-4d36-bf59-8bcab319e34b/wjnf_a_2356695_f0016_oc.jpg)
Table 6. Material properties.
Figure 17. Moisture content profiles under dry conditions in the internal finish layer made of gypsum plaster or hemp shives or flax shives.
![Figure 17. Moisture content profiles under dry conditions in the internal finish layer made of gypsum plaster or hemp shives or flax shives.](/cms/asset/87d4a624-e69f-4d04-9ee8-486112247659/wjnf_a_2356695_f0017_oc.jpg)
Figure 18. Moisture content profiles under wet conditions in the internal finish layer made of gypsum plaster or hemp shives or flax shives.
![Figure 18. Moisture content profiles under wet conditions in the internal finish layer made of gypsum plaster or hemp shives or flax shives.](/cms/asset/591b144a-79c5-4108-b3b2-2b166b3b59a0/wjnf_a_2356695_f0018_oc.jpg)