230
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Biomarkers of Mercury Exposure in Two Eastern Ukraine Cities

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 187-193 | Published online: 04 Mar 2011
 

Abstract

This study evaluates biomarkers of mercury exposure among residents of Horlivka, a city in eastern Ukraine located in an area with geologic and industrial sources of environmental mercury, and residents of Artemivsk, a nearby comparison city outside the mercury-enriched area. Samples of urine, blood, hair, and nails were collected from study participants, and a questionnaire was administered to obtain data on age, gender, occupational history, smoking, alcohol consumption, fish consumption, tattoos, dental amalgams, home heating system, education, source of drinking water, and family employment in mines. Median biomarker mercury concentrations in Artemivsk were 0.26 μg/g-Cr (urine), 0.92 μg/L (blood), 0.42 μg/g (hair), 0.11 μg/g (toenails), and 0.09 μg/g (fingernails); median concentrations in Horlivka were 0.15 μg/g-Cr (urine), 1.01 μg/L (blood), 0.14 μg/g (hair), 0.31 μg/g (toenails), and 0.31 μg/g (fingernails). Biomarkers of mercury exposure for study participants from Horlivka and Artemivsk are low in comparison with occupationally exposed workers at a mercury recycling facility in Horlivka and in comparison with exposures known to be associated with clinical effects. Blood and urinary mercury did not suggest a higher mercury exposure among Horlivka residents as compared with Artemivsk; however, three individuals living in the immediate vicinity of the mercury mines had elevated blood and urinary mercury, relative to overall results for either city. For a limited number of residents from Horlivka (N = 7) and Artemivsk (N = 4), environmental samples (vacuum cleaner dust, dust wipes, soil) were collected from their residences. Mercury concentrations in vacuum cleaner dust and soil were good predictors of blood and urinary mercury.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Boris Panov and Yuri Panov of the Donetsk National Technical University, Donetsk, Ukraine; Volodymyr Mukhin, Donetsk Institute of Hygiene and Occupational Health, Donetsk, Ukraine; Chiemeka Chine, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; Suzette Morman, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado; and Joe Bunnell, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, for their help with this study. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers selected by the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. This study was supported, in part, by a Cooperative Grant (UKG1-2633) from the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation.

Any use of trade, product or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 148.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.