3,127
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessment of spray polyurethane foam worker exposure to organophosphate flame retardants through measures in air, hand wipes, and urine

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all

Figures & data

Figure 1. Photos of helper (left) and sprayer (right). The helpers cut and bundled freshly sprayed foam, sometimes without coveralls or gloves. The sprayer usually wore partial coverall, gloves, and an air-supplied respirator for protection from overspray.

Figure 1. Photos of helper (left) and sprayer (right). The helpers cut and bundled freshly sprayed foam, sometimes without coveralls or gloves. The sprayer usually wore partial coverall, gloves, and an air-supplied respirator for protection from overspray.

Table 1. Characteristics of participating spray polyurethane foam workers.

Table 2. Flame retardant metabolites quantified in urine samples.

Figure 2. TCPP air concentrations by job position (N = 29). The box represents the interquartile range, the line in each box represents the median, and the triangle represents the GM. The upper whisker represents the far upper fence 1.5 IQR above the 75th percentile, the lower whisker represents the lower fence 1.5 IQR below the 25th percentile, and the circles represent outliers.

Figure 2. TCPP air concentrations by job position (N = 29). The box represents the interquartile range, the line in each box represents the median, and the triangle represents the GM. The upper whisker represents the far upper fence 1.5 IQR above the 75th percentile, the lower whisker represents the lower fence 1.5 IQR below the 25th percentile, and the circles represent outliers.

Table 3. TCPP hand wipe concentrations* (ng/sample) and comparisons.

Table 4. Urine sampling concentrations* using paired t-test (μg/g cr).

Table 5. Univariate analysis results using a mixed model with company as a random effect.

Table 6. Multivariate analysis results using a mixed model with company as a random effect.

Figure 3. BCPP and BDCPP creatinine-adjusted urine concentrations by position and time compared to the adult male general population (N = 29). The box represents the interquartile range, the line in each box represents the median, and the black triangle represents the GM. The upper whisker represents the far upper fence 1.5 IQR above 75th percentile, the lower whisker represents the lower fence 1.5 IQR below the 25th percentile, and the circles represent outliers. *The GM and 95th% CI for BCPP and BDCPP were general population averages calculated using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2014 (men above age 18).

Figure 3. BCPP and BDCPP creatinine-adjusted urine concentrations by position and time compared to the adult male general population (N = 29). The box represents the interquartile range, the line in each box represents the median, and the black triangle represents the GM. The upper whisker represents the far upper fence 1.5 IQR above 75th percentile, the lower whisker represents the lower fence 1.5 IQR below the 25th percentile, and the circles represent outliers. *The GM and 95th% CI for BCPP and BDCPP were general population averages calculated using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2014 (men above age 18).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (179.4 KB)