1,901
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports from Workshop Session “Immunotoxicity Evaluation by Immune Function Test,” Society of Toxicology 45th Annual Meeting, March 5-9, 2006 San Diego, California

Comparison of Primary Immune Responses to SRBC and KLH in Rodents

, &
Pages 153-158 | Received 23 Jan 2007, Accepted 13 Mar 2007, Published online: 09 Oct 2008

Figures & data

FIG. 1 Left panel: B6C3F1 female mice were sensitized intravenously (IV) with SRBC and evaluated on Day 4 in the Plaque Assay. Data are presented as specific activity (IgM AFC/106 spleen cells) or total spleen activity (IgM AFC/spleen). Middle panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 100 μ g/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 5. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Right panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 2 mg/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 5. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Results are expressed as percent of vehicle control. *p ≤ 0.05 or **p ≤ 0.01 vs. vehicle treated animals. Each group consisted of eight animals.

FIG. 1 Left panel: B6C3F1 female mice were sensitized intravenously (IV) with SRBC and evaluated on Day 4 in the Plaque Assay. Data are presented as specific activity (IgM AFC/106 spleen cells) or total spleen activity (IgM AFC/spleen). Middle panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 100 μ g/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 5. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Right panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 2 mg/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 5. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Results are expressed as percent of vehicle control. *p ≤ 0.05 or **p ≤ 0.01 vs. vehicle treated animals. Each group consisted of eight animals.

FIG. 2 Left panel: Sprague–Dawley (SD) female rats were sensitized with SRBC and evaluated on Day 4 in the Plaque Assay. Data are presented as specific activity (IgM AFC/106 spleen cells). Middle panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 100 μ g/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 6. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Right panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 2 mg/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 6. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Results are expressed as percent of vehicle control. *p ≤ 0.05 or **p ≤ 0.01 vs. vehicle-treated animals. Each group consisted of 7–8 animals.

FIG. 2 Left panel: Sprague–Dawley (SD) female rats were sensitized with SRBC and evaluated on Day 4 in the Plaque Assay. Data are presented as specific activity (IgM AFC/106 spleen cells). Middle panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 100 μ g/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 6. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Right panel: Animals were sensitized IV with 2 mg/animal of KLH and serum collected on Day 6. Serum levels of IgM anti-KLH antibody were determined by ELISA. Results are expressed as percent of vehicle control. *p ≤ 0.05 or **p ≤ 0.01 vs. vehicle-treated animals. Each group consisted of 7–8 animals.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.