167
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Shaping Provisioning Systems for Social-Ecological Transformation

Preferences, enablers, and barriers for 1.5°C lifestyle options: Findings from Citizen Thinking Labs in five European Union countries

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2375806 | Received 08 Nov 2023, Accepted 28 Jun 2024, Published online: 20 Jul 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Main phases of the CTL process, including an overview of methods and data collected.

Figure 1. Main phases of the CTL process, including an overview of methods and data collected.

Figure 2. Steps of the CTL event.

Figure 2. Steps of the CTL event.

Figure 3. Average, highest, and lowest carbon-footprint data according to case county.

Figure 3. Average, highest, and lowest carbon-footprint data according to case county.

Figure 4. Mosaic plots illustrating frequencies of the acceptance of lifestyle options across (a) consumption domains, (b) main investment types, and (c) impact levels.

Figure 4. Mosaic plots illustrating frequencies of the acceptance of lifestyle options across (a) consumption domains, (b) main investment types, and (c) impact levels.

Table 1. Significance and strength of association between acceptance vs. rejection and different categorizations.

Table 2. The five lifestyle options with the highest (above 90%) acceptance rates (see Supplementary Material I, Section E for average acceptance rates for all options).

Table 3. The five lifestyle options with the lowest acceptance rates (see Supplementary Material I, Section E for average acceptance rates for all options).

Supplemental material

Richter Supplementary Material_mc edit 210624_clean.docx

Download MS Word (11.8 MB)