1,972
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Early absorption sources of caffeine can be a useful strategy for improving female table tennis players-specific performance

, ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2282051 | Received 17 Jul 2023, Accepted 31 Oct 2023, Published online: 16 Nov 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. The anthropometric data of participants.

Figure 1. Cross-over and double-blind study design in three conditions.

Figure 1. Cross-over and double-blind study design in three conditions.

Figure 2. The protocol of taking supplements and performing tests.

Figure 2. The protocol of taking supplements and performing tests.

Figure 3. Service test on target.

Figure 3. Service test on target.

Figure 4. Forehand drive test on target.

Figure 4. Forehand drive test on target.

Table 2. The functional variables (mean ± standard deviation) measured in the three different experimental conditions.

Figure 5. Changes in agility, hand movement, speed of movement and coordination in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) agility test. (b) hand speed test. (c) speed of movement test. (d) coordination test. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05). #: significant difference compared to CMR(P < 0.05).

Figure 5. Changes in agility, hand movement, speed of movement and coordination in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) agility test. (b) hand speed test. (c) speed of movement test. (d) coordination test. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05). #: significant difference compared to CMR(P < 0.05).

Figure 6. Changes in the explosive power of lower body muscles, isometric handgrip strength, explosive power of upper body muscles and cognitive test in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) explosive power of lower body muscles. (b) isometric hand strength. (c) explosive power of upper body muscles. (d) cognitive test. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05).

Figure 6. Changes in the explosive power of lower body muscles, isometric handgrip strength, explosive power of upper body muscles and cognitive test in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) explosive power of lower body muscles. (b) isometric hand strength. (c) explosive power of upper body muscles. (d) cognitive test. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05).

Figure 7. Changes in serve, forehand drive, backhand push and counter in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) serve test. (b) forehand drive test. (c) backhand push test. (d) counter test. PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05).

Figure 7. Changes in serve, forehand drive, backhand push and counter in three conditions of this study (PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum). (a) serve test. (b) forehand drive test. (c) backhand push test. (d) counter test. PLA: placebo. CMR: caffeine mouth rinsing. CG: caffeine chewing gum. *: significant difference compared to PLA(P < 0.05).

Table 3. Pairwise comparisons in three conditions (PLA, CMR, CG).