ABSTRACT
Objective: In recent years, treatment of substance use disorder has rekindled emphasis on recovery which, being a gradual process, starts with remoralization. In this study, we examine the level of demoralization throughout the treatment process for patients with comorbid substance dependence and psychiatric disorders. Methods: 217 patients with co-occurring disorders and 179 community-based individuals participated in this study. Demoralization was measured twice over one month as inpatient treatment happened. Results: In contrast with the community sample, we found high levels of demoralization in the clinical cohort, with 86% of patients having demoralization scores above threshold. During the first month there was a statistically significant reduction in demoralization scores. However, clinically relevant change appeared limited, with only 3% of patients moving from dysfunctional to functional status in this naturalistic setting without targeted intervention aimed at remoralization. Conclusions: Although the level of demoralization is significantly improved during the first month of treatment, patients still remain strongly demoralized. Clinically relevant improvement is limited. It could be worthwhile to set up targeted interventions aimed at remoralization. Furthermore, we advocate for the assessment of demoralization in the clinical setting to monitor patients' treatment outcomes.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to all who have contributed in one way or another to this work, especially for the support of the patients themselves and from our colleagues of the dual diagnosis treatment clinics: De Loodds (Delta Psychiatric Center, Poortugaal), De Woenselse Poort (Mental Health Care, Eindhoven), IrisZorg (Centre for Addiction Treatment and Rehabilitation, Wolfheze), Novadic-Kentron (Network for Addiction Treatment Services, Vught), Tactus (Center for Addiction Treatment, Deventer), Breburg Group (Mental Health Care, Tilburg and Breda), and Mental Health Care WNB (Halsteren). Furthermore, we thank Merel Ooms and Noortje van den Nieuwenhuizen for their contributions to previous drafts of this paper.
Disclosures
None of the authors has any additional income to report.
Funding
The study was performed based on data that were obtained from the centers that participated in the Dual Diagnosis Monitoring Project. No additional funding was received.