974
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reading between the lines: Subtle stereotype threat cues can motivate performance

, &
Pages 52-68 | Received 20 Apr 2012, Accepted 31 Oct 2012, Published online: 27 Nov 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1. Total percentage correct as a function of participant gender and threat condition. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error of the mean.
Figure 1. Total percentage correct as a function of participant gender and threat condition. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error of the mean.

Table 1. GRE performance as a function of participant gender, stereotype threat condition, and problem type

Table 2. Percentage of problems on which the solving approach was used by males and females as a function of stereotype threat condition and problem type

Figure 2. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Subtle stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (subtle stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).
Figure 2. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Subtle stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (subtle stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).
Figure 3. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Single asterisks (*) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .05. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Blatant stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (blatant stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).
Figure 3. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Single asterisks (*) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .05. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Blatant stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (blatant stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.