Figures & data
![Figure 1. Total percentage correct as a function of participant gender and threat condition. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error of the mean.](/cms/asset/1c4b83fe-43df-4dac-9a88-abfe9196b657/psif_a_746206_f0001_b.gif)
Table 1. GRE performance as a function of participant gender, stereotype threat condition, and problem type
Table 2. Percentage of problems on which the solving approach was used by males and females as a function of stereotype threat condition and problem type
![Figure 2. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Subtle stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (subtle stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).](/cms/asset/7e20cfa7-4c93-4df4-96a2-a41e70a07056/psif_a_746206_f0002_b.gif)
![Figure 3. Number of times females used the prepotent solving approach on comparison trials as a mediator of number of comparison problems answered incorrectly. Coefficients in parentheses indicate zero-order correlations. Coefficients not in parentheses represent parameter estimates for a recursive path model including both predictors. Single asterisks (*) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .05. Double asterisks (**) indicate parameter estimates or correlations that differ from zero at p < .01. Blatant stereotype threat condition is dummy coded (blatant stereotype threat = 1, no stereotype threat = 0).](/cms/asset/6f5b7fae-4b9f-4dab-bc85-b622781e99eb/psif_a_746206_f0003_b.gif)