Quid pro quo: The effect of individuals' exchange orientation on prosocial behavior and the moderating role of mortality salience

Figures & data

Table 1 Logistic regression results of participants' donation choice as a function of exchange orientation and mortality condition (N = 67)

		Model 1^a				Model 2^b
Model χ^2 (df)		8.631 (2)				12.93 (3)
Statistical significance		.013				.005
Nagelkerke's R^2		.16				.24
Change in χ^2						4.30
Statistical significance of Δχ^2						.038
Parameter estimate results following stepwise modeling
		Parameter estimates				Model
Model	Parameter	b	SE	Wald's χ^2	p	Δχ^2	p
(1)	Exchange orientation	− 0.68	0.29	5.74	.017	8.63	.013
	Mortality condition	0.64	0.54	1.44	.230
(2)	Exchange orientation ×  mortality condition	1.25	0.63	3.89	.049	4.30	.038

a Model 1 consists of the two independent variables (Step 1).

b Model 2 consists of the two independent variables and the interaction (Step 2).

Figure 1 Donation probability of participation payment as a function of participants' exchange orientation and mortality condition.