Figures & data
Table 1. Regression coefficients, standard errors and 95% confidence intervals (CI) together with predicted proportion dead (%) on the backtransformed original scale for each cultivar at week 23 after inoculating with M. phaseolina isolate BRIP 66625 from the logistic regression model using Firth’s method
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for cultivars tested compared to the reference cultivar ‘Camarosa’ when challenged with M. phaseolina isolate BRIP 66625. A hazard ratio of 1 or more implies equal or greater susceptibility than the control ‘Camarosa’. Hazard ratios less than 1 imply greater resistance than ‘Camarosa’. Columns with the same subscript are not significantly different in response to the pathogen (P ≥ 0.05)
![Figure 1. Hazard ratios for cultivars tested compared to the reference cultivar ‘Camarosa’ when challenged with M. phaseolina isolate BRIP 66625. A hazard ratio of 1 or more implies equal or greater susceptibility than the control ‘Camarosa’. Hazard ratios less than 1 imply greater resistance than ‘Camarosa’. Columns with the same subscript are not significantly different in response to the pathogen (P ≥ 0.05)](/cms/asset/c9b0cb2b-4811-4136-8f4a-712545291d5b/wsfr_a_1709114_f0001_b.gif)