7,602
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

How does estrogen work on autophagy?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 197-211 | Received 12 Mar 2018, Accepted 22 Aug 2018, Published online: 25 Sep 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. The regulation of E2 on autophagy.

Table 2. The regulation of autophagy by ESR ligands a.

Figure 1. Schematic view of ESR distribution in organs.

Figure 1. Schematic view of ESR distribution in organs.

Figure 2. Action of ESR ligands on autophagy. Dashed lines indicate tissue type-dependent activation or inhibition; dotted lines indicate crosstalk between receptors.

Figure 2. Action of ESR ligands on autophagy. Dashed lines indicate tissue type-dependent activation or inhibition; dotted lines indicate crosstalk between receptors.

Table 3. Autophagy proteins regulated by E2 via TFs.

Figure 3. Regulation of E2 on core autophagy proteins via TFs. JUN, subunit of AP-1; TP53, tumor protein p53.

Figure 3. Regulation of E2 on core autophagy proteins via TFs. JUN, subunit of AP-1; TP53, tumor protein p53.

Figure 4. Model of how estrogenic regulation of autophagy affects cell fate. E2 helps maintain moderate autophagy and cellular homeostasis. Both deficient and excessive autophagy are abnormal. Deficient autophagy can lead to unfolded protein response (UPR) stress, which may reestablish homeostasis through the induction of autophagy. However, the UPR can further lead to carcinogenesis. The proliferation of cancer may induce a status of hypoxia and starvation, both of which can induce autophagy. Here, if a new balance is achieved, cells still have a chance to survive, which is bad for the treatment of cancer. Only when excessive autophagy releases enough calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytoplasm can apoptosis be triggered. Furthermore, activated caspases will cleave BECN1 and turn off autophagy. Autophagy inducers may prevent carcinogenesis when autophagy in non-cancer cells is deficient, or they may promote excessive autophagy in cancer cells and lead to apoptosis. Autophagy inhibitors seem to block the survival of cancer cells during starvation; however, the inhibition of autophagy cannot persist. The persistent stimulation of UPR stress also promotes autophagy.

Figure 4. Model of how estrogenic regulation of autophagy affects cell fate. E2 helps maintain moderate autophagy and cellular homeostasis. Both deficient and excessive autophagy are abnormal. Deficient autophagy can lead to unfolded protein response (UPR) stress, which may reestablish homeostasis through the induction of autophagy. However, the UPR can further lead to carcinogenesis. The proliferation of cancer may induce a status of hypoxia and starvation, both of which can induce autophagy. Here, if a new balance is achieved, cells still have a chance to survive, which is bad for the treatment of cancer. Only when excessive autophagy releases enough calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytoplasm can apoptosis be triggered. Furthermore, activated caspases will cleave BECN1 and turn off autophagy. Autophagy inducers may prevent carcinogenesis when autophagy in non-cancer cells is deficient, or they may promote excessive autophagy in cancer cells and lead to apoptosis. Autophagy inhibitors seem to block the survival of cancer cells during starvation; however, the inhibition of autophagy cannot persist. The persistent stimulation of UPR stress also promotes autophagy.

Figure 5. Association between estrogen and autophagy. E2 balances the expression of core autophagy proteins through diverse transcription factors, miRNAs, and histone modifications via signaling pathways downstream of the receptors. The autophagic proteins controlled by E2 are involved in the entire process of autophagy. Lipids released by autophagy are the major source of cholesterol, the precursor of estrogen biosynthesis. E2 in the blood causes a negative feedback to reduce circulating levels of hormones. E2 activates NOS3 and initiates the synthesis of NO via membrane ESRs. NO induces autophagy by suppressing MTOR expression. In addition, some estrogen-regulated TFs and miRNAs can target ESRs. As the major mechanism for ESR degradation in eukaryotic cells, ESRs dissociate from complexes with HSPs upon binding of E2, are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases (ULs), and are targeted for degradation. The fate of mtESRs and lysosomal ESR1 and GPER1 during autophagy is not yet clear. Ac, acetylation; GF, growth factor; HSPs, heat-shock proteins; HRAS, HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase; Me, methylation; RAF1, Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; RTKs, receptor tyrosine kinases; SRC, SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinase; ULs, ubiquitin ligases.

Figure 5. Association between estrogen and autophagy. E2 balances the expression of core autophagy proteins through diverse transcription factors, miRNAs, and histone modifications via signaling pathways downstream of the receptors. The autophagic proteins controlled by E2 are involved in the entire process of autophagy. Lipids released by autophagy are the major source of cholesterol, the precursor of estrogen biosynthesis. E2 in the blood causes a negative feedback to reduce circulating levels of hormones. E2 activates NOS3 and initiates the synthesis of NO via membrane ESRs. NO induces autophagy by suppressing MTOR expression. In addition, some estrogen-regulated TFs and miRNAs can target ESRs. As the major mechanism for ESR degradation in eukaryotic cells, ESRs dissociate from complexes with HSPs upon binding of E2, are ubiquitinated by ubiquitin ligases (ULs), and are targeted for degradation. The fate of mtESRs and lysosomal ESR1 and GPER1 during autophagy is not yet clear. Ac, acetylation; GF, growth factor; HSPs, heat-shock proteins; HRAS, HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase; Me, methylation; RAF1, Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; RTKs, receptor tyrosine kinases; SRC, SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinase; ULs, ubiquitin ligases.