10,790
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

WLS/wntless is essential in controlling dendritic cell homeostasis via a WNT signaling-independent mechanism

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 4202-4217 | Received 18 Jun 2020, Accepted 18 Mar 2021, Published online: 14 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Effect of WLS deficiency on BMDCs. (A) Colony formation of BMDCs with wild-type, heterozygous, or wls-null (wlsfx/fx) genotypes (n = 8). (B and C) Percentage of apoptotic and autophagic BMDCs with wild-type, heterozygous, or wls-null genotypes (n = 8). (D) Western blots of autophagic markers (LC3B, PIK3C3, ATG5, ATG12 and ATG16L1) in lysates of wild-type and wls-null BMDCs (n = 3; p< 0.001). (E) Percentage of apoptotic BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes by WNT1 and WNT3A treatment. (F) Percentage of autophagic BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes after WNT1 and WNT3A treatment. (G) Level of cytokine-expressing cells in wild-type or wls-null (wlsfx/fx) BMDCs. (H) Levels of IL12A, IL6, and IL10 secreted by wild-type and wls-null BMDCs, or (I) IFNG and TNF secreted by cocultured CD4+ T cells in the presence or absence of LPS. (J) Spleen size in wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice with or without LPS treatment. Flow cytometric analysis of the total number of (K) splenocytes and (L) DCs in wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice after LPS treatment (n = 8; p< 0.001)

Figure 1. Effect of WLS deficiency on BMDCs. (A) Colony formation of BMDCs with wild-type, heterozygous, or wls-null (wlsfx/fx) genotypes (n = 8). (B and C) Percentage of apoptotic and autophagic BMDCs with wild-type, heterozygous, or wls-null genotypes (n = 8). (D) Western blots of autophagic markers (LC3B, PIK3C3, ATG5, ATG12 and ATG16L1) in lysates of wild-type and wls-null BMDCs (n = 3; p< 0.001). (E) Percentage of apoptotic BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes by WNT1 and WNT3A treatment. (F) Percentage of autophagic BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes after WNT1 and WNT3A treatment. (G) Level of cytokine-expressing cells in wild-type or wls-null (wlsfx/fx) BMDCs. (H) Levels of IL12A, IL6, and IL10 secreted by wild-type and wls-null BMDCs, or (I) IFNG and TNF secreted by cocultured CD4+ T cells in the presence or absence of LPS. (J) Spleen size in wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice with or without LPS treatment. Flow cytometric analysis of the total number of (K) splenocytes and (L) DCs in wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice after LPS treatment (n = 8; p< 0.001)

Figure 2. WLS deficiency results in ER stress and the loss of ER quality control. (A) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors, EIF2AK3-ElF2A signals, and calcium regulators in wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (fx/+), and wls-null (fx/fx) Itgax-Cre BMDCs. (B) TEM analysis of the ultrastructure and translational ribosome complex in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. Red arrow, translational ribosomal complex. (C) intracellular calcium levels in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs following treatment with CCL2 (0.7 nM). (D-F) Western blotting analysis of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5 CANX, and CALR in anti-WLS, anti-ERN1, and anti-EIF2AK3 immunoprecipitates probed with the respective antibodies in wild-type or wls-deficient BMDCs. Data were generated from three independent experiments. (G) Confocal immunofluorescent imaging of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, and ATF6 in wild-type or wls-null BMDCs. (H-I), Western blot analysis of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5, CANX, and CALR in anti-WLS immunoprecipitates of BMDCs treated with WNT1 and WNT3A, respectively

Figure 2. WLS deficiency results in ER stress and the loss of ER quality control. (A) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors, EIF2AK3-ElF2A signals, and calcium regulators in wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (fx/+), and wls-null (fx/fx) Itgax-Cre BMDCs. (B) TEM analysis of the ultrastructure and translational ribosome complex in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. Red arrow, translational ribosomal complex. (C) intracellular calcium levels in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs following treatment with CCL2 (0.7 nM). (D-F) Western blotting analysis of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5 CANX, and CALR in anti-WLS, anti-ERN1, and anti-EIF2AK3 immunoprecipitates probed with the respective antibodies in wild-type or wls-deficient BMDCs. Data were generated from three independent experiments. (G) Confocal immunofluorescent imaging of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, and ATF6 in wild-type or wls-null BMDCs. (H-I), Western blot analysis of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5, CANX, and CALR in anti-WLS immunoprecipitates of BMDCs treated with WNT1 and WNT3A, respectively

Figure 3. WLS coordinates a multi-protein complex and regulates ER stress response in BMDCs

(A-C) Western blot analysis of WLS, ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5, CANX, and CALR in anti-WLS immunoprecipitates and BMDC cells by TM, BFA, and TG treatment, respectively. (D-F) Level of intracellular calcium in wild-type or wls-null BMDCs following treatment with TM, BFA and DTT, respectively. (G-J) Relative levels of mRNAs for total Xbp1.total (Xbp1t), spliced Xbp1 (Xbp1s), Hspa5, and Ddit3 in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs treated with vehicle control or TM (15 μM) (p < 0.001; n.s., not significant; N ≥ 10 in each panel). (K-L), percentage of autophagic and apoptotic BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes after TM, BFA, TG, or DTT treatment, respectively.
Figure 3. WLS coordinates a multi-protein complex and regulates ER stress response in BMDCs

Figure 4. WLS-mediated molecular chaperone supercomplex modulates protein glycosylation, cytokine secretion, and cell fate in BMDCS. (A) Total glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes after TM, BFA, or DTT treatment. (B) Glycosylation levels of different kinds of glycan modification of total proteins determined by phenol-sulfuric acid method. (C) Heatmap of 507 biomarkers in wild-type and wls-null (wlsfx/fx) BMDCs; (D) Comparison of the number of hypoglycosylated proteins between wild-type and wls-null cells. #, hypo-glycosylation, no significance (*, p< 0.05); (E) GO biological process over-representation analysis with 15 signal pathways between wild-type and wls-null cells; (F) Glycosylation levels of CDH5/VE-Cadherin, BMPR1B, TGFBR1, LRP6, FZD1/Frizzled-1, FZD3, FZD4, FZD5, FZD6, and CTNNB1/β-catenin in wild-type and wls-null cells. (G) Glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in anti-WNT1, WNT3A, and WNT5A immunoprecipitates of wild-type and wls-null BMDC. (H) Levels of WNT1, WNT3A, and WNT5A as measured by ELISA in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. (I) Glycosylation levels of INS (insulin), IGF1, GRB2, IGF2R, INSR, GCG (glucagon), SLC2A1/GLUT1, SLC2A2, SLC2A3, and SLC2A5 in wild-type and wls-null cells. (J-K) Levels of GCG, glucose, and ATP as measured by ELISA in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. (L) Glycosylation levels of CD14, TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, IFNB, IL6, and TNF in wild-type and wls-null cells. (M) Glycosylation levels of IFNA, IFNG, IFNAR1, IFNGR2, IL10, IL12A, IL23A and TGFA in wild-type and wls-null cells

Figure 4. WLS-mediated molecular chaperone supercomplex modulates protein glycosylation, cytokine secretion, and cell fate in BMDCS. (A) Total glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in BMDCs with wild-type and wls-null genotypes after TM, BFA, or DTT treatment. (B) Glycosylation levels of different kinds of glycan modification of total proteins determined by phenol-sulfuric acid method. (C) Heatmap of 507 biomarkers in wild-type and wls-null (wlsfx/fx) BMDCs; (D) Comparison of the number of hypoglycosylated proteins between wild-type and wls-null cells. #, hypo-glycosylation, no significance (*, p< 0.05); (E) GO biological process over-representation analysis with 15 signal pathways between wild-type and wls-null cells; (F) Glycosylation levels of CDH5/VE-Cadherin, BMPR1B, TGFBR1, LRP6, FZD1/Frizzled-1, FZD3, FZD4, FZD5, FZD6, and CTNNB1/β-catenin in wild-type and wls-null cells. (G) Glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in anti-WNT1, WNT3A, and WNT5A immunoprecipitates of wild-type and wls-null BMDC. (H) Levels of WNT1, WNT3A, and WNT5A as measured by ELISA in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. (I) Glycosylation levels of INS (insulin), IGF1, GRB2, IGF2R, INSR, GCG (glucagon), SLC2A1/GLUT1, SLC2A2, SLC2A3, and SLC2A5 in wild-type and wls-null cells. (J-K) Levels of GCG, glucose, and ATP as measured by ELISA in wild-type and wls-null BMDCs. (L) Glycosylation levels of CD14, TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, IFNB, IL6, and TNF in wild-type and wls-null cells. (M) Glycosylation levels of IFNA, IFNG, IFNAR1, IFNGR2, IL10, IL12A, IL23A and TGFA in wild-type and wls-null cells

Figure 5. WLS coordinates a multi-protein complex and regulates ER stress response in A549 cells. (A) Wild-type and various deletion mutants of WLS as indicated. (B) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors and CANX-CALR complex expression in anti-GFP immunoprecipitates from wild-type and mutant WLS-transfected A549 cells. Arrow, HSPA5. (C) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors and calcium regulators (ITPR1, RYR1, and ATP2A1) in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or mutant WLS (Arrow, ITPR1). (D) Confocal microscopy imaging of the interaction between WLS and EIF2AK3 in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLSΔCT mutants. WLS, green; EIF2AK3, red; and nuclei, blue. (E) Percentage of autophagic A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. (F) Intracellular calcium levels in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. (G) glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. Data were generated from three independent experiments for each panel (***, p< 0.001)

Figure 5. WLS coordinates a multi-protein complex and regulates ER stress response in A549 cells. (A) Wild-type and various deletion mutants of WLS as indicated. (B) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors and CANX-CALR complex expression in anti-GFP immunoprecipitates from wild-type and mutant WLS-transfected A549 cells. Arrow, HSPA5. (C) Western blot analysis of UPR sensors and calcium regulators (ITPR1, RYR1, and ATP2A1) in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or mutant WLS (Arrow, ITPR1). (D) Confocal microscopy imaging of the interaction between WLS and EIF2AK3 in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLSΔCT mutants. WLS, green; EIF2AK3, red; and nuclei, blue. (E) Percentage of autophagic A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. (F) Intracellular calcium levels in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. (G) glycosylation levels as measured by ELISA in A549 cells transfected with wild-type or WLS mutants. Data were generated from three independent experiments for each panel (***, p< 0.001)

Figure 6. In vivo mouse EAE model. (A) Clinical score (means ± SEM) of MOG35–55-induced EAE in wild-type or DC-specific, wls-null (wlsfx/fx) mice (N = 8 mice/group; ***p < 0.0001). (B-E) Number of DCs, pDCs, cDCs, and CNS-infiltrating Th1, Th17, or Th1/Th17 (CD4+ IFNG+ IL17A+) CD4+ T cells from MOG35–55-induced wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice on day 21 (N = 8 mice/group; p < 0.001 in two-tailed unpaired t-test; n.s., not significant n ≥ 12). (F) Histological analysis of spinal cords of wild-type and wls-null mice with EAE using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining. (G-K) Total number of inflammatory cells and cell differentials in BALFs after OVA challenge (p < 0.001; n.s., not significant). (L) H&E staining of lung tissues in wild-type and wls-null mice (N = 12)

Figure 6. In vivo mouse EAE model. (A) Clinical score (means ± SEM) of MOG35–55-induced EAE in wild-type or DC-specific, wls-null (wlsfx/fx) mice (N = 8 mice/group; ***p < 0.0001). (B-E) Number of DCs, pDCs, cDCs, and CNS-infiltrating Th1, Th17, or Th1/Th17 (CD4+ IFNG+ IL17A+) CD4+ T cells from MOG35–55-induced wild-type and DC-specific wls-null mice on day 21 (N = 8 mice/group; p < 0.001 in two-tailed unpaired t-test; n.s., not significant n ≥ 12). (F) Histological analysis of spinal cords of wild-type and wls-null mice with EAE using hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining. (G-K) Total number of inflammatory cells and cell differentials in BALFs after OVA challenge (p < 0.001; n.s., not significant). (L) H&E staining of lung tissues in wild-type and wls-null mice (N = 12)

Figure 7. A schematic diagram illustrates a hypothetical model of WLS as an essential chaperone docking ER stress sensors and CANX-CALR complex and controlling ER homeostasis. According to our results, WLS integrates the CANX-CALR cycle, UPR sensors (ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5) and calcium regulators (not depicted in the scheme) via different interacting domains. Functionally, the WLS-associated complex controls glycoprotein quality, ER homeostasis and, at least in part, cellular survival, growth and response, whereas WLS deficiency releases UPR sensors and dissociates the CANX-CALR complex, resulting in global hypo-glycosylation and activation of UPR signaling, leading to autophagy, apoptosis and cell death

Figure 7. A schematic diagram illustrates a hypothetical model of WLS as an essential chaperone docking ER stress sensors and CANX-CALR complex and controlling ER homeostasis. According to our results, WLS integrates the CANX-CALR cycle, UPR sensors (ERN1, EIF2AK3, ATF6, HSPA5) and calcium regulators (not depicted in the scheme) via different interacting domains. Functionally, the WLS-associated complex controls glycoprotein quality, ER homeostasis and, at least in part, cellular survival, growth and response, whereas WLS deficiency releases UPR sensors and dissociates the CANX-CALR complex, resulting in global hypo-glycosylation and activation of UPR signaling, leading to autophagy, apoptosis and cell death
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (8 MB)