1,536
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Stage 4S neuroblastoma tumors show a characteristic DNA methylation portrait

, , , , , & show all
Pages 761-771 | Received 06 Jul 2016, Accepted 17 Aug 2016, Published online: 06 Sep 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. MBD sequencing analysis of MYCN non-amplified stage 4S, stage 4, and stage 1/2 tumors identifies stage-specific promoter methylation portraits. A. Diagram of the promoters identified as hypermethylated in the respective sample groups. For example, 393 and 1,150 promoters are specifically hyper- and hypomethylated in stage 4S, respectively. B. Principal component (PC) analysis using the normalized read counts of the promoters included in the diagram. Shown are the data for the first 2 PCs. PC1 explains 29.9% of the variability of the data and PC2 10.1%.

Figure 1. MBD sequencing analysis of MYCN non-amplified stage 4S, stage 4, and stage 1/2 tumors identifies stage-specific promoter methylation portraits. A. Diagram of the promoters identified as hypermethylated in the respective sample groups. For example, 393 and 1,150 promoters are specifically hyper- and hypomethylated in stage 4S, respectively. B. Principal component (PC) analysis using the normalized read counts of the promoters included in the diagram. Shown are the data for the first 2 PCs. PC1 explains 29.9% of the variability of the data and PC2 10.1%.

Figure 2. Stage 4S differentially methylated promoters are not randomly distributed across the genome. A. Percentage of stage 4S hypermethylated promoters per chromosome, based on promoter density corrected numbers. Significantly under- and overrepresented chromosomes are indicated with a dark dot. The vertical line represents the percentage if the stage 4S hypermethylated promoters would be randomly distributed across the genome (null hypothesis). B. Percentage of stage 4S hypomethylated promoters per chromosome, based on promoter density corrected numbers. Significantly under- and overrepresented chromosomes are indicated with a dark dot. The vertical line represents the percentage if the stage 4S hypomethylated promoters would be randomly distributed across the genome (null hypothesis). C. Significantly enriched cytogenetic locations of stage 4S hyper- and hypomethylated promoters. A list of genes located in the enriched regions can be found in Supplemental Table 2.

Figure 2. Stage 4S differentially methylated promoters are not randomly distributed across the genome. A. Percentage of stage 4S hypermethylated promoters per chromosome, based on promoter density corrected numbers. Significantly under- and overrepresented chromosomes are indicated with a dark dot. The vertical line represents the percentage if the stage 4S hypermethylated promoters would be randomly distributed across the genome (null hypothesis). B. Percentage of stage 4S hypomethylated promoters per chromosome, based on promoter density corrected numbers. Significantly under- and overrepresented chromosomes are indicated with a dark dot. The vertical line represents the percentage if the stage 4S hypomethylated promoters would be randomly distributed across the genome (null hypothesis). C. Significantly enriched cytogenetic locations of stage 4S hyper- and hypomethylated promoters. A list of genes located in the enriched regions can be found in Supplemental Table 2.

Figure 3. Stage 4S hypermethylated, and stage 4 and 1/2 hypomethylated promoters are frequently located on subtelomeres. Depicted are the percentages of the stage-specific differentially methylated promoters located in the 1 Mb (A) and 2 Mb (B) subtelomeres. Stage 4S hypermethylated and stage 4 hypomethylated promoters have a significantly larger proportion of 1 Mb and 2 Mb subtelomeric promoters, compared to stage 1/2 and stage 4 hypermethylated and stage 4S hypomethylated promoters. Stage 1/2 hypomethylated promoters also comprise a larger proportion of 2 Mb subtelomeric promoters, compared to stage 1/2 and stage 4 hypermethylated and stage 4S hypomethylated promoters.

Figure 3. Stage 4S hypermethylated, and stage 4 and 1/2 hypomethylated promoters are frequently located on subtelomeres. Depicted are the percentages of the stage-specific differentially methylated promoters located in the 1 Mb (A) and 2 Mb (B) subtelomeres. Stage 4S hypermethylated and stage 4 hypomethylated promoters have a significantly larger proportion of 1 Mb and 2 Mb subtelomeric promoters, compared to stage 1/2 and stage 4 hypermethylated and stage 4S hypomethylated promoters. Stage 1/2 hypomethylated promoters also comprise a larger proportion of 2 Mb subtelomeric promoters, compared to stage 1/2 and stage 4 hypermethylated and stage 4S hypomethylated promoters.

Table 1. One third of subtelomeres are enriched in stage 4S hypermethylated promoters.

Table 2. Specific transcription factor targets are enriched in stage 4S differentially methylated promoters.

Table 3. Oncogenic signatures are enriched in stage 4S hypomethylated promoters.

Table 4. Multiple stage 4S differentially methylated genes are also differentially expressed.

Supplemental material

KEPI_A_1226739_s07.zip

Download Zip (24 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.