Figures & data
Figure 1. Selection of ELEMENT subjects for the study1.
1Offspring from enrollment cohorts 2 and 3 were re-contacted and re-enrolled based on availability of prenatal and neonatal biospecimens. We did not re-contact Cohort 1 participants, originally recruited in 1994–96, because the majority had advanced stages or had completed pubertal development.
![Figure 1. Selection of ELEMENT subjects for the study1.1Offspring from enrollment cohorts 2 and 3 were re-contacted and re-enrolled based on availability of prenatal and neonatal biospecimens. We did not re-contact Cohort 1 participants, originally recruited in 1994–96, because the majority had advanced stages or had completed pubertal development.](/cms/asset/11fa6bc5-a3a2-4e51-b3c4-8c489d66f583/kepi_a_1556198_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Distributions of tanner stages and other covariates among 250 ELEMENT children at the early-teen visit (Visit 1) and again at the late-teen visit (Visit 2) for 222 children who continued follow-up.
Table 2. DNA Methylation at LINE-1, H19, HSD11B2 and IGF2 among all individuals and stratified by sexa.
Table 3. Associations between site-specific visit 1 (early-teen) DNA methylation and visit 1 (early-teen) or visit 2 (late-teen) pubertal onset, in adjusted Cox survival modela,b. CpG sites with at least one significant relationship (p < 0.05) are shown. See Supplemental Table 2 for full results.
Table 4. Associations between site-specific visit 1 (early-teen) DNA methylation and pubertal progression from visit 1 (early-teen) to visit 2 (late-teen), in adjusted multivariate regression model a,b,c. CpG sites with at least one significant relationship (p < 0.05) are shown (see Supplemental Table 3 for full results). Odds Ratios are shown from adjusted models for the main effect of DNA methylation along with the interaction between DNA methylation and time between visits.