Figures & data
Figure 1. Drought phenotype of Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), cml37 and cml42 knockout plants. Drought phenotype of WT Col-0 (left), cml37 (middle) and cml42 plants each after 1 (top line) or 2 weeks (bottom line) of drought treatment. The plants shown represent the typical phenotype observed in multiple replicates.
![Figure 1. Drought phenotype of Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), cml37 and cml42 knockout plants. Drought phenotype of WT Col-0 (left), cml37 (middle) and cml42 plants each after 1 (top line) or 2 weeks (bottom line) of drought treatment. The plants shown represent the typical phenotype observed in multiple replicates.](/cms/asset/1530e996-3ef8-44bd-879b-0c2198c0b704/kpsb_a_1011951_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. ABA level in Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), cml37 and cml42 knock-out plants upon drought treatment. Mean content (± SE, n = 6) of ABA in Col-0, cml37 and cml42 plants. ABA content was analyzed in untreated plants (white), and plants subjected to 1 week (gray) and 2 weeks of drought treatment (black). ABA was measured from the whole plant rosette. Statistically significant differences between treatments were analyzed by One Way ANOVA (P < 0.05, SNK test).
![Figure 2. ABA level in Arabidopsis WT (Col-0), cml37 and cml42 knock-out plants upon drought treatment. Mean content (± SE, n = 6) of ABA in Col-0, cml37 and cml42 plants. ABA content was analyzed in untreated plants (white), and plants subjected to 1 week (gray) and 2 weeks of drought treatment (black). ABA was measured from the whole plant rosette. Statistically significant differences between treatments were analyzed by One Way ANOVA (P < 0.05, SNK test).](/cms/asset/53025952-4126-4a55-b529-240d127fcfa6/kpsb_a_1011951_f0002_b.gif)