Figures & data
Figure 1. In-vitro plant growth assay of Cymbidium aloifolium colonized by P. indica (a) compared to uncolonized plantlets, control (b) for 45 days of growth assay.
![Figure 1. In-vitro plant growth assay of Cymbidium aloifolium colonized by P. indica (a) compared to uncolonized plantlets, control (b) for 45 days of growth assay.](/cms/asset/fb06ef2f-93ea-40e4-bd1b-8ab26d6207f2/kpsb_a_1596716_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Morphological changes in growth pattern of the P. indica-colonized plantlet versus uncolonized plantlet in terms of mean of roots and shoots number (a) as well as mean of root and shoot length (b). Bar represents mean ± SE (n = 15). The data is significant at the level of P ≤ 0.05.
![Figure 2. Morphological changes in growth pattern of the P. indica-colonized plantlet versus uncolonized plantlet in terms of mean of roots and shoots number (a) as well as mean of root and shoot length (b). Bar represents mean ± SE (n = 15). The data is significant at the level of P ≤ 0.05.](/cms/asset/1328e7ed-14ea-4528-a7d1-90654bc00563/kpsb_a_1596716_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Microscopic view showing the formation of clamdospore in the cortical section of root tissue (arrow indicates the clamdospore formation inside the cortex region of root section).
![Figure 3. Microscopic view showing the formation of clamdospore in the cortical section of root tissue (arrow indicates the clamdospore formation inside the cortex region of root section).](/cms/asset/306a2d91-4e97-4326-b311-999d65d28f78/kpsb_a_1596716_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Bioactive compound present in methanolic extracts of the control plantlets (uncolonized).
Table 2. Bioactive compound present in methanolic extracts of the P. indica-colonized plantlets.
Figure 4. Acclimatization and hardening of the P. indica-colonized plants and uncolonized plants for 3 months using different compositions of substrate at different ratios. (a) Control. (b)Treated. (c) Control. (d) Treated. (e) Control. (f) Treated. (g) Control. (h) Treated.
![Figure 4. Acclimatization and hardening of the P. indica-colonized plants and uncolonized plants for 3 months using different compositions of substrate at different ratios. (a) Control. (b)Treated. (c) Control. (d) Treated. (e) Control. (f) Treated. (g) Control. (h) Treated.](/cms/asset/2b1c4a0c-8ece-462a-aa3c-8257c895cc08/kpsb_a_1596716_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Morphological changes in growth pattern of P. indica-colonized plantlet versus uncolonized plantlet (3-month-old) after acclimatization in terms of mean of roots and shoots number (a) as well as mean of root and shoot length (b). Bar represents mean ± SE (n = 15). The data is significant at the level of P ≤ 0.05.
![Figure 5. Morphological changes in growth pattern of P. indica-colonized plantlet versus uncolonized plantlet (3-month-old) after acclimatization in terms of mean of roots and shoots number (a) as well as mean of root and shoot length (b). Bar represents mean ± SE (n = 15). The data is significant at the level of P ≤ 0.05.](/cms/asset/2af9e99f-1ef8-4e93-bc36-69a9d5b14605/kpsb_a_1596716_f0005_oc.jpg)