1,606
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rapid Communication

Police lethal force errors and stress physiology during video and live evaluation simulations

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 90-100 | Received 05 Apr 2023, Accepted 12 Jul 2023, Published online: 06 Aug 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Police lethal force error rates during video and live simulations. When averaging across multiple scenarios and use of force decision types (i.e., shoot/no-shoot), officers made significantly more decision-making errors during video simulations relative to live simulations. Error bars show SEM.

Note: *** p < 0.001
Figure 1. Police lethal force error rates during video and live simulations. When averaging across multiple scenarios and use of force decision types (i.e., shoot/no-shoot), officers made significantly more decision-making errors during video simulations relative to live simulations. Error bars show SEM.

Figure 2. Police lethal force error rates by decision type during video and live simulations. within the video simulation condition, officers made significantly more decision-making errors during no-shoot scenarios (grey bar) relative to shoot scenarios (black bar). Lethal force error rates did not differ between live simulation decision types, with no errors made by any officers in a no-shoot scenario responding to an individual in mental crisis. Error bars are extremely small, reflecting low variability in error rates, and are plotted to show SEM.

Note: *** p < 0.001
Figure 2. Police lethal force error rates by decision type during video and live simulations. within the video simulation condition, officers made significantly more decision-making errors during no-shoot scenarios (grey bar) relative to shoot scenarios (black bar). Lethal force error rates did not differ between live simulation decision types, with no errors made by any officers in a no-shoot scenario responding to an individual in mental crisis. Error bars are extremely small, reflecting low variability in error rates, and are plotted to show SEM.

Table 1. Video and live simulation error rates. All 187 participants performed the video and live simulations as part of their agency’s annual use of force requalification day. Eight behavioral data points were missing due to facilitators not recording a score. The number of observations included in error rate calculations are indicated for each simulation condition (video, live) and individual scenario.

Figure 3. Autonomic arousal during video and live simulations. Both video and live simulation conditions elicited significant autonomic arousal relative to rest, with live simulations eliciting higher HRMax compared to video simulations. Error bars show SEM.

Note: *** p < 0.001
Figure 3. Autonomic arousal during video and live simulations. Both video and live simulation conditions elicited significant autonomic arousal relative to rest, with live simulations eliciting higher HRMax compared to video simulations. Error bars show SEM.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (122 KB)