378
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigations

Metabolic profiling for water-soluble metabolites in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls in a Chinese population: A case-control study

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 357-367 | Received 07 Jan 2019, Accepted 02 May 2019, Published online: 04 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Objectives: Objective measures integrated with clinical symptoms may improve early prevention and detection of schizophrenia. Herein we aim to evaluate potential water-soluble metabolic biomarkers in schizophrenia.

Methods: We recruited adults with schizophrenia (n = 113) who had not received pharmacological treatment for at least 1 month prior to enrollment and 111 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects from Weifang, Shandong province, China. All serum samples were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column.

Results: Eleven metabolites, namely carnitines (oleoylcarnitine, l-palmitoylcarnitine, 9-decenoylcarnitine and 2-trans,4-cis-decadienoylcarnitine), polar lipids (lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)(P-16:0), LPC (16:0), LPC (15:0) and LPC(14:0)), amino acids (taurine and l-arginine), and organic acid (2,5-dichloro-4-oxohex-2-enedioate), separated the patients and healthy controls. Compared with healthy controls, taurine, l-palmitoylcarnitine and oleoylcarnitine levels were higher, whereas the remaining eight metabolites were lower in patients with schizophrenia. A combination of four metabolites, i.e., oleoylcarnitine, 9-decenoylcarnitine, LPC (15:0) and LPC (14:0), provided the most robust between-group separation.

Conclusions: This study appears to distinguish between groups of patients and controls, which should be considered as a contribution to putative potential biomarkers. The water-soluble metabolites were determined to be significantly different between the groups in the current study, and were primarily related to cellular bioenergetics, notably oxidative stress.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Beijing Omics Bio-tech Co., Ltd, for their kind help in data collection for this study. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. We thank team members for their support and contributions to this study.

Contributors

JYW and BC conceived and designed the study; BC and DFW collected the data and performed the statistical analysis; BC, ZHP, RSMcI, EB, JYW and DFW contributed to the discussion; JYW, ZHP, RSMcI, EB and MS revised the paper. All authors have read and approved the final version of this article.

Institutional review board statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Public Health at Peking University Health Science Centre (IRB00001052-14071).

Statement of interest

None to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Peking University Health Science Centre Medical Cross Disciplinary Fund [BMU20140435]. The supporting foundation had no involvement in study design, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 341.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.