3,786
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Biocompatible hydrogels for the controlled delivery of anti-hypertensive agent: development, characterization and in vitro evaluation

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 18-32 | Received 12 Nov 2017, Accepted 19 Feb 2018, Published online: 12 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. The graphical representation of different crosslinking methods.

Figure 1. The graphical representation of different crosslinking methods.

Figure 2. Chemical structure of captopril.

Figure 2. Chemical structure of captopril.

Table 1. Feed composition of different formulations of Ge/PVP based hydrogels.

Figure 3. Presumptive chemical structure of Ge/PVP based hydrogels.

Figure 3. Presumptive chemical structure of Ge/PVP based hydrogels.

Figure 4. The schematic representation of acid base reactions in corresponding buffer media.

Figure 4. The schematic representation of acid base reactions in corresponding buffer media.

Table 2. Amount of captopril loaded in different samples of GE/PVP hydrogels.

Table 3. % Release of captopril from different samples of Ge/PVP hydrogels.

Figure 5. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels with different concentrations of Ge using glutaraldehyde (GA) as crosslinking agent in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 5. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels with different concentrations of Ge using glutaraldehyde (GA) as crosslinking agent in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 6. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels having varying concentrations of PVP (3.5, 4 and 4.5 g) using GA as crosslinking agent (3.8 wt% of Ge and PVP) in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 6. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels having varying concentrations of PVP (3.5, 4 and 4.5 g) using GA as crosslinking agent (3.8 wt% of Ge and PVP) in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 7. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels having varying concentrations GA as crosslinking agent (3.5 wt%, 4 wt% and 4.2 wt% of Ge and PVP) in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).

Figure 7. Equilibrium swelling ratio of Ge/PVP hydrogels having varying concentrations GA as crosslinking agent (3.5 wt%, 4 wt% and 4.2 wt% of Ge and PVP) in solutions of different pH; pH 1.2 (□), pH 5.5 (●), pH 6.5 (♦) and pH 7.5 (▲).

Figure 8. Cumulative % release of captopril from Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Effect of variable concentration of Ge on % drug release in solution of different pH values (B) Effect of crosslinking agent concentration on % drug release in solution of different pH values. The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 8. Cumulative % release of captopril from Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Effect of variable concentration of Ge on % drug release in solution of different pH values (B) Effect of crosslinking agent concentration on % drug release in solution of different pH values. The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Table 4. Gel fraction of different formulation of Ge/PVP hydrogels.

Figure 9. Effect of processing variables on gel fraction of Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Ge Concentration (B) PVP Concentration (C) GA Concentration, The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 9. Effect of processing variables on gel fraction of Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Ge Concentration (B) PVP Concentration (C) GA Concentration, The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Table 5. Porosity of different formulations of Ge/PVP hydrogels.

Figure 10. Effect of processing variables on porosity of Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Ge concentration (B) PVP concentration (C) GA concentration. The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Figure 10. Effect of processing variables on porosity of Ge/PVP hydrogels (A) Ge concentration (B) PVP concentration (C) GA concentration. The data present the mean ± standard deviation of n = 3 individual readings.

Table 6. Flory-Huggins network parameters of Ge/PVP hydrogels.

Table 7. Effect of Ge concentration on drug release kinetics of Ge/PVP hydrogels in different pH solutions using GA as crosslinker (3.8 wt% of Ge and Pec).

Table 8. Effect of Ge concentration on drug release mechanism of Ge/PVP hydrogels in different pH solutions using GA as crosslinker (3.8 wt% of Ge and Pec).

Table 9. Effect of concentration of crosslinker (GA) on drug release kinetics of Ge/PVP hydrogels in different pH solutions.

Table 10. Effect of concentration of crosslinker (GA) on drug release mechanism of Ge/PVP hydrogels in different pH solutions.

Figure 11. FT-IR spectra of (A) Gelatin (B) PVP (C) Unloaded hydrogel sample (D) Loaded hydrogel sample (E) Captopril.

Figure 11. FT-IR spectra of (A) Gelatin (B) PVP (C) Unloaded hydrogel sample (D) Loaded hydrogel sample (E) Captopril.

Figure 12. XRD spectra of (A) drug loaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample (B) unloaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample.

Figure 12. XRD spectra of (A) drug loaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample (B) unloaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample.

Figure 13. SEM analysis of Surface morphology of Ge/PVP hydrogel (A) Unloaded sample (B) loaded sample (C) Cross-sectional morphology of Unloaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample (D) loaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample.

Figure 13. SEM analysis of Surface morphology of Ge/PVP hydrogel (A) Unloaded sample (B) loaded sample (C) Cross-sectional morphology of Unloaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample (D) loaded Ge/PVP hydrogel sample.