1,954
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Designing for Reimagined Communities

Local adequacy as a design strategy in place-based making

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 115-134 | Received 11 Mar 2021, Accepted 01 Nov 2021, Published online: 09 Dec 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The geographical context of the study. Three cases are probes into three different types of Russian rurality: the borderland between underdeveloped area and forest area, forest-agricultural area, agricultural area. Map by Irina Osadcheva, a research team member, adapted from (Nefedova and Pallot Citation2006).

Figure 1. The geographical context of the study. Three cases are probes into three different types of Russian rurality: the borderland between underdeveloped area and forest area, forest-agricultural area, agricultural area. Map by Irina Osadcheva, a research team member, adapted from (Nefedova and Pallot Citation2006).

Figure 2. Classic ‘top-tops’. Photos by Daria Zhukovskaya, a field team member, June 2018.

Figure 2. Classic ‘top-tops’. Photos by Daria Zhukovskaya, a field team member, June 2018.

Figure 3. Top-tops 2.0/versatile tractors. Photos by Daria Zhukovskaya, a field team member, June 2018.

Figure 3. Top-tops 2.0/versatile tractors. Photos by Daria Zhukovskaya, a field team member, June 2018.

Figure 4. Examples of use of ‘space metal’. Photos by Alexandra Raeva, August 2018.

Figure 4. Examples of use of ‘space metal’. Photos by Alexandra Raeva, August 2018.

Figure 5. For working with the four-millimetre sheet metal, the local boat-makers crafted (top left) a bender (zagibulina) for shaping the beak and sides of the boat; (bottom left) a wooden vice for clamping workpieces in place; and (right) a new metal cutter for the ‘Druzhba’ gasoline chainsaw. Photos by Alexandra Raeva, August 2018.

Figure 5. For working with the four-millimetre sheet metal, the local boat-makers crafted (top left) a bender (zagibulina) for shaping the beak and sides of the boat; (bottom left) a wooden vice for clamping workpieces in place; and (right) a new metal cutter for the ‘Druzhba’ gasoline chainsaw. Photos by Alexandra Raeva, August 2018.

Figure 6. Pozhva ‘jeeps’ and their makers/owners. Photos by Ilya Abramov, a field team member, March 2018.

Figure 6. Pozhva ‘jeeps’ and their makers/owners. Photos by Ilya Abramov, a field team member, March 2018.

Figure 7. The workshop and tools of Pozhva’s best-known handyman in making cross-country vehicles on low-pressure tires. Photos by Ilya Abramov, a field team member, March 2018.

Figure 7. The workshop and tools of Pozhva’s best-known handyman in making cross-country vehicles on low-pressure tires. Photos by Ilya Abramov, a field team member, March 2018.

Figure 8. Four stages of Pozhva jeeps’ evolution: (1) an early version with a front ski was made based on drawings in a Soviet DIY-magazine, (2) a three-wheeler was an all-season modification, later advanced to (3) a four-wheeler that became a ‘golden standard’; and (4) a six-wheeler, which was a trial that did not fit in Pozhva’s everyday living. Photos and compilation by Alexandra Raeva.

Figure 8. Four stages of Pozhva jeeps’ evolution: (1) an early version with a front ski was made based on drawings in a Soviet DIY-magazine, (2) a three-wheeler was an all-season modification, later advanced to (3) a four-wheeler that became a ‘golden standard’; and (4) a six-wheeler, which was a trial that did not fit in Pozhva’s everyday living. Photos and compilation by Alexandra Raeva.