2,602
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Understanding integration within the Dutch multi-layer safety approach to flood risk management

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 81-87 | Received 10 Sep 2020, Accepted 30 Mar 2021, Published online: 08 May 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematization of the layers of the multi-layer safety approach (Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, Citation2009). From bottom to top: Layer 1 (preventive-structural measures) aims at avoiding waterlogging through structural measures (e.g. dikes and barriers); Layer 2 (resilient spatial planning) contributes to reducing the negative effects of flooding through the physical spatial structure, (e.g. elevated buildings); Layer 3 (disaster management) aims at helping the society in case of a disaster occurs with evacuation measures (e.g. disaster plans and risk maps).

Figure 1. Schematization of the layers of the multi-layer safety approach (Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, Citation2009). From bottom to top: Layer 1 (preventive-structural measures) aims at avoiding waterlogging through structural measures (e.g. dikes and barriers); Layer 2 (resilient spatial planning) contributes to reducing the negative effects of flooding through the physical spatial structure, (e.g. elevated buildings); Layer 3 (disaster management) aims at helping the society in case of a disaster occurs with evacuation measures (e.g. disaster plans and risk maps).

Table 1. The proposed dimensions of integration for the multi-layer safety approach (adapted from Ran & Nedovic-Budic, Citation2016).

Table 2. Policy integration among layers of the multi-layer safety approach.

Table 3. Territorial integration between stakeholders of the multi-layer safety approach, both within and between the different layers.