228
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Urban runoff quality and quantity control: a functional comparison of various types of detention basins

, , , &
Pages 1080-1092 | Received 07 Jan 2022, Accepted 22 Aug 2022, Published online: 07 Sep 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Hydraulic behavior and pollutant removal efficiency of three stormwater end-of-pipe control structures were evaluated and compared. Three detention basins (wet, dry, and semi-dry, i.e. dry with a wet central channel) were monitored within three sites of Southern Quebec, Canada. Water samples were collected upstream and downstream of the basins and analyzed for total suspended solids (TSS), nitrogen, total phosphorous, and ions related to de-icing salts. Generalized linear models and hydrological/hydraulic (SWMM) models were developed to compute the long-term TSS and total phosphorous load removal efficiency for two of the studied basins. Results indicate that even when considering uncertainties, removal rates are the highest for the wet basin and the lowest for the dry one. The addition of a wet channel in the semi-dry basin leads to higher removal efficiency than in the dry basin (e.g. median TSS concentration removal of 69% and 14%, respectively, for the semi-dry and dry basins).

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the cities of Québec and Trois-Rivières, particularly Jean-Francois Bazinet, Christine Beaulieu, Alexandre Baker, Martin Carbonneau, and Martin Milot, for giving access to the study sites, providing data and models, and helping with the choice of the study sites. The support of CHI Int. and Bentley, for providing free academic licenses for PCSWMM and SewerGEMS, respectively, is also acknowledged. Support of udergraduate students for field work is also acknowledged.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2022.2117633

Additional information

Funding

This project was funded by a Collaborative Research and Development (CRD) grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; #CRDPJ 530548-18). K. Proteau received scholarships from NSERC and Fonds De Recherche Du Québec Nature Et Technologie (FRQNT).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 239.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.