Figures & data
Fig. 1. Alqueva reservoir: geographic location, floating platforms and meteorological stations. A zoom from Alqueva-Montante platform equipped with the IRGASON instrument; details of the sonic anemometer, gas analyser and accelerometer.
![Fig. 1. Alqueva reservoir: geographic location, floating platforms and meteorological stations. A zoom from Alqueva-Montante platform equipped with the IRGASON instrument; details of the sonic anemometer, gas analyser and accelerometer.](/cms/asset/71a1fd2e-c76e-471d-b160-4ad99bb0704f/zela_a_1272787_f0001_c.jpg)
Fig. 2. Scheme of the apparatus developed for measurements of spectral underwater solar irradiance. Detail of the optical receiver and multilayer protecting frame of underwater device for measuring downwelling spectral irradiance.
![Fig. 2. Scheme of the apparatus developed for measurements of spectral underwater solar irradiance. Detail of the optical receiver and multilayer protecting frame of underwater device for measuring downwelling spectral irradiance.](/cms/asset/47c03c8f-05b3-4864-b99a-3bba73ece661/zela_a_1272787_f0002_c.jpg)
Fig. 3. Average normalized frequency-weighted co-spectra for CO2, H2O and sonic temperature (Ts) as a function of normalized frequency for the period 23–26 July 2014.
![Fig. 3. Average normalized frequency-weighted co-spectra for CO2, H2O and sonic temperature (Ts) as a function of normalized frequency for the period 23–26 July 2014.](/cms/asset/220d1c6e-86a5-47dc-a800-aea97a0a67f6/zela_a_1272787_f0003_c.jpg)
Fig. 4. (a) Footprint length (X90) in the wind directions 270–90º; (b) scatterplot of footprint (X90) and stability (z/L) during the period June–September 2014.
![Fig. 4. (a) Footprint length (X90) in the wind directions 270–90º; (b) scatterplot of footprint (X90) and stability (z/L) during the period June–September 2014.](/cms/asset/7ce12c3e-8f25-4bdb-8f87-5db3bfcc5055/zela_a_1272787_f0004_c.jpg)
Fig. 5. Mean daily cycle of sensible heat flux (left y-axis; circles) and temperature difference between air (2 m) and near-surface water (right y-axis; stars) during the period June–September 2014.
![Fig. 5. Mean daily cycle of sensible heat flux (left y-axis; circles) and temperature difference between air (2 m) and near-surface water (right y-axis; stars) during the period June–September 2014.](/cms/asset/59ec087e-af3d-4903-9e42-33c20394208a/zela_a_1272787_f0005_c.jpg)
Fig. 6. (a) Mean daily cycle of latent heat flux (LE) (left y-axis; circles) and water vapour (right y-axis; stars); (b) mean daily cycle of latent heat flux (left y-axis; circles) and wind speed (right y-axis; stars), during the period June–September 2014.
![Fig. 6. (a) Mean daily cycle of latent heat flux (LE) (left y-axis; circles) and water vapour (right y-axis; stars); (b) mean daily cycle of latent heat flux (left y-axis; circles) and wind speed (right y-axis; stars), during the period June–September 2014.](/cms/asset/a2f74dbf-81b5-4c47-b137-f0187c5cd03c/zela_a_1272787_f0006_c.jpg)
Fig. 7. (a) Mean daily cycle of net radiation (Rn), water column heat storage (∆Q), latent heat flux (LE) and sensible heat flux (H) during the period June–September 2014. (b) Average energy residual (Res) measured with different depths for water column heat storage (∆Q) calculations during the period June–September 2014. EBC = energy balance closure.
![Fig. 7. (a) Mean daily cycle of net radiation (Rn), water column heat storage (∆Q), latent heat flux (LE) and sensible heat flux (H) during the period June–September 2014. (b) Average energy residual (Res) measured with different depths for water column heat storage (∆Q) calculations during the period June–September 2014. EBC = energy balance closure.](/cms/asset/81240aac-5ee1-4ee1-a2c4-a50956116614/zela_a_1272787_f0007_c.jpg)
Fig. 8. Mean daily cycle of CO2 flux (left y-axis; circles) and CO2 concentration (right y-axis; stars) during the period June–September 2014.
![Fig. 8. Mean daily cycle of CO2 flux (left y-axis; circles) and CO2 concentration (right y-axis; stars) during the period June–September 2014.](/cms/asset/b74db748-5ca1-4d40-8cb5-0caf3e33ec73/zela_a_1272787_f0008_c.jpg)
Fig. 9. Profiles in Alqueva-Montante on 10 July 2014: (a) underwater downwelling spectral irradiance measured with the new devices; (b) underwater downwelling spectral radiance with the device from Potes et al. (Citation2013). Profiles are given in digital numbers (DN); output values without calibration.
![Fig. 9. Profiles in Alqueva-Montante on 10 July 2014: (a) underwater downwelling spectral irradiance measured with the new devices; (b) underwater downwelling spectral radiance with the device from Potes et al. (Citation2013). Profiles are given in digital numbers (DN); output values without calibration.](/cms/asset/2dd97812-e908-4cea-ad66-489fdba13603/zela_a_1272787_f0009_c.jpg)
Table 1. Measurement details
Fig. 10. Profiles of underwater downwelling spectral irradiance: (a) in the municipal swimming complex of Évora; (b) in Alqueva reservoir. Profiles are in percentage of surface irradiance.
![Fig. 10. Profiles of underwater downwelling spectral irradiance: (a) in the municipal swimming complex of Évora; (b) in Alqueva reservoir. Profiles are in percentage of surface irradiance.](/cms/asset/c02adf14-7551-494d-9f78-4c4ce6eb522c/zela_a_1272787_f0010_c.jpg)
Fig. 12. Wind rose for 23 selected days in the period 13–15 UTC (units of m s−1) for (a) Barbosa and (b) Cid Almeida stations (1 min resolution). The criteria for the selection were: daily maximum of the temperature difference between air (in Barbosa station) and water (in Alqueva-Montante) greater than 7 ºC, and daily average wind speed lower than 3.5 m s−1 at Barbosa station.
![Fig. 12. Wind rose for 23 selected days in the period 13–15 UTC (units of m s−1) for (a) Barbosa and (b) Cid Almeida stations (1 min resolution). The criteria for the selection were: daily maximum of the temperature difference between air (in Barbosa station) and water (in Alqueva-Montante) greater than 7 ºC, and daily average wind speed lower than 3.5 m s−1 at Barbosa station.](/cms/asset/c810a7a1-b7ee-496e-b527-f88de9d6d618/zela_a_1272787_f0012_c.jpg)
Fig. 13. Mean daily cycle of latent heat flux for 23 selected days with development of lake breeze and 27 selected days without lake breeze.
![Fig. 13. Mean daily cycle of latent heat flux for 23 selected days with development of lake breeze and 27 selected days without lake breeze.](/cms/asset/dd2fe133-3d05-44b6-b271-c1e1ce5adce6/zela_a_1272787_f0013_c.jpg)