790
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Multi-year ocean thermal variability

Pages 1-15 | Received 25 Feb 2020, Accepted 10 Sep 2020, Published online: 24 Oct 2020

Figures & data

Fig. 1. Bathymetry of the model (km) at 1 km intervals. As the deep ocean influences the thermal structure with increasing duration, the complex geometry of the topography can be dominant in the physics dividing the ocean into a large number of regionally distinct places. Compare to Sverdrup et al. (Citation1942, Plate 1). Inset here and in other figures is a histogram of the plotted values.

Fig. 1. Bathymetry of the model (km) at 1 km intervals. As the deep ocean influences the thermal structure with increasing duration, the complex geometry of the topography can be dominant in the physics dividing the ocean into a large number of regionally distinct places. Compare to Sverdrup et al. (Citation1942, Plate 1). Inset here and in other figures is a histogram of the plotted values.

Fig. 2. Average potential temperature (not the anomaly) at 477 m during 1994. Note the multi-modality of the values (inset).

Fig. 2. Average potential temperature (not the anomaly) at 477 m during 1994. Note the multi-modality of the values (inset).

Fig. 3. Standard deviation (oC) in time of annual mean temperature at 477 m over 26 years. Intricacy of the northern North Atlantic is apparent, as are the Kuroshio path, the region south of Cape Agulhas, and other ‘hot spots’. Spatial stationarity is an unattractive hypothesis.

Fig. 3. Standard deviation (oC) in time of annual mean temperature at 477 m over 26 years. Intricacy of the northern North Atlantic is apparent, as are the Kuroshio path, the region south of Cape Agulhas, and other ‘hot spots’. Spatial stationarity is an unattractive hypothesis.

Fig. 4. Twenty-six year time-average of the vertical mean potential temperature (°C) in the ECCOv4r4 state estimate, T¯G(ϕ,λ).

Fig. 4. Twenty-six year time-average of the vertical mean potential temperature (°C) in the ECCOv4r4 state estimate, T¯G(ϕ,λ).

Fig. 5. Standard deviation (°C) for potential temperatures as a global average (a) and for the layer-thickness weighted values (b), m °C. Note use of the logarithmic scale for temperature alone. All model grid areas are given equal weight here.

Fig. 5. Standard deviation (°C) for potential temperatures as a global average (a) and for the layer-thickness weighted values (b), m °C. Note use of the logarithmic scale for temperature alone. All model grid areas are given equal weight here.

Fig. 6. Anomaly of vertically integrated temperature for 1993, TG(λ,ϕ,t=1993) (°C).

Fig. 6. Anomaly of vertically integrated temperature for 1993, TG(λ,ϕ,t=1993) (°C).

Fig. 7. Same as except for 1998 – an El Niño year.

Fig. 7. Same as Fig. 6 except for 1998 – an El Niño year.

Fig. 8. Same as except for 2017. An east-west basin divide occurs in the Atlantic Ocean.

Fig. 8. Same as Fig. 6 except for 2017. An east-west basin divide occurs in the Atlantic Ocean.

Table 1. Notation used when applying the SVD to differing fields. Singular vectors are all functions of a geographic coordinate, or of time.

Fig. 9. (a) Global mean of first 3 vertical singular vectors. u d1(z) reaches 0.1 at a depth of 300 m and the plot is truncated for visibility. (b) Shows the accumulated variance in each global median λdi2 normalized to sum to 1. Roughly speaking, the lowest SVD carries about 75% of the variance and the first 3 represent over 95% of the variance. (c) Shows the first 3 vd1(t).

Fig. 9. (a) Global mean of first 3 vertical singular vectors. u d1(z) reaches 0.1 at a depth of 300 m and the plot is truncated for visibility. (b) Shows the accumulated variance in each global median λdi2 normalized to sum to 1. Roughly speaking, the lowest SVD carries about 75% of the variance and the first 3 represent over 95% of the variance. (c) Shows the first 3 vd1(t).

Fig. 10. The lowest singular vector ud1 at a variety of latitudes along 180° W (dimensionless). Greatest depths do not exist for these particular positions.

Fig. 10. The lowest singular vector ud1 at a variety of latitudes along 180° W (dimensionless). Greatest depths do not exist for these particular positions.

Fig. 11. (a) Fraction of the number of zeros occurring in all vertical modes ud. (b) Fraction of the number of zeros occuring only in the lowest mode ud1.

Fig. 11. (a) Fraction of the number of zeros occurring in all vertical modes ud. (b) Fraction of the number of zeros occuring only in the lowest mode ud1.

Fig. 12. Fraction of the vertical variance at each point in the lowest singular vector ud1 (dimensionless). It is, in general, not the same as a linear dynamical mode, but contains extra structure (zero crossings in the vertical).

Fig. 12. Fraction of the vertical variance at each point in the lowest singular vector ud1 (dimensionless). It is, in general, not the same as a linear dynamical mode, but contains extra structure (zero crossings in the vertical).

Fig. 13. (a) Global median singular values λGj (°C) and their normalized cumulative sum (b). (c) Shows the mean temporal coefficients vGj(t) for j=1,2,3.

Fig. 13. (a) Global median singular values λGj (°C) and their normalized cumulative sum (b). (c) Shows the mean temporal coefficients vGj(t) for j=1,2,3.

Fig. 14. Structure of 1000uG1 mapped onto latitude and longitude (dimensionless). Sign change coincides with the yellow-blue boundary.

Fig. 14. Structure of 1000uG1 mapped onto latitude and longitude (dimensionless). Sign change coincides with the yellow-blue boundary.

Fig. 15. 1000uG2 mapped onto latitude and longitude.

Fig. 15. 1000uG2 mapped onto latitude and longitude.

Fig. 16. 1000uG3. Western tropical Pacific and high North Atlantic structures are notable.

Fig. 16. 1000uG3. Western tropical Pacific and high North Atlantic structures are notable.

Fig. 17. Eigenvalues of the principal observation patterns (POPs), plotted as absolute value, real and imaginary parts.

Fig. 17. Eigenvalues of the principal observation patterns (POPs), plotted as absolute value, real and imaginary parts.