1,987
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment in Thai patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &

Figures & data

Table 1. Clinical and biological characteristics at initiation of second-line treatment.

Table 2. Efficacy of second-line treatment.

Table 3. Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions.

Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis shows the RFS of patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia after second-line treatment. (A) 1-year RFS was 70%, and 2-year RFS was 61.2%. (B) RFS according to gender, males had better RFS than females (median RFS: not reached vs. median RFS: 20.6 months) (p = 0.023).

Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis shows the RFS of patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia after second-line treatment. (A) 1-year RFS was 70%, and 2-year RFS was 61.2%. (B) RFS according to gender, males had better RFS than females (median RFS: not reached vs. median RFS: 20.6 months) (p = 0.023).