Figures & data
Table 1. Clinical and biological characteristics at initiation of second-line treatment.
Table 2. Efficacy of second-line treatment.
Table 3. Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis shows the RFS of patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia after second-line treatment. (A) 1-year RFS was 70%, and 2-year RFS was 61.2%. (B) RFS according to gender, males had better RFS than females (median RFS: not reached vs. median RFS: 20.6 months) (p = 0.023).
![Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis shows the RFS of patients with primary warm-type autoimmune hemolytic anemia after second-line treatment. (A) 1-year RFS was 70%, and 2-year RFS was 61.2%. (B) RFS according to gender, males had better RFS than females (median RFS: not reached vs. median RFS: 20.6 months) (p = 0.023).](/cms/asset/e5e05dcd-73a4-4823-8ff5-f9fadf960165/yhem_a_1671060_f0001_oc.jpg)