Figures & data
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Figure 1. Legend: Gating strategy for T cell analysis: (A) helper CD4+ T cells as CD3+/CD4+ T cells; (B) IFNγ+, IL-4 + and IFNγ+/IL-4+ CD4+ T cells within CD4+ T cells; (C) IL-17a + CD4+ T cells within CD4+ T cells; (D) cytotoxic CD8+ T cells as CD3+/CD8+ T cells; (E) IFNγ+, IL-4 + and IFNγ+/IL-4+ CD8+ T cells within CD8+ T cells
![Figure 1. Legend: Gating strategy for T cell analysis: (A) helper CD4+ T cells as CD3+/CD4+ T cells; (B) IFNγ+, IL-4 + and IFNγ+/IL-4+ CD4+ T cells within CD4+ T cells; (C) IL-17a + CD4+ T cells within CD4+ T cells; (D) cytotoxic CD8+ T cells as CD3+/CD8+ T cells; (E) IFNγ+, IL-4 + and IFNγ+/IL-4+ CD8+ T cells within CD8+ T cells](/cms/asset/a0c9f5bf-f192-40d4-91f4-7cdc9f0d2be0/yhem_a_2304486_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Treatment discontinuation during follow-up: after 6 and 12 months, respectively.
Figure 2. Legend: The results of CD8+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 2. Legend: The results of CD8+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/47d2c254-4d6c-43fe-8ec8-eb89bfa8d0ee/yhem_a_2304486_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Legend: The results of IRI stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 3. Legend: The results of IRI stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/68a25f38-abfb-4348-8407-31175812014e/yhem_a_2304486_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Legend: The results of antiplatelet autoantibodies (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 4. Legend: The results of antiplatelet autoantibodies (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 6-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/72c6e643-faf8-4ee6-8a2f-c838a1dbdb1d/yhem_a_2304486_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. The results of CD8+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 5. The results of CD8+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/eec18e31-bc9d-45c6-9fb4-dea9a74c3814/yhem_a_2304486_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. The results of CD8+/IL-4+/IFN-γ+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 6. The results of CD8+/IL-4+/IFN-γ+ T lymphocytes (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/3b8ec140-4a41-465a-9788-e537dae6cf1d/yhem_a_2304486_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. The results of IRI stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 7. The results of IRI stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/c287e216-059c-404c-ae5c-4e49b27994f6/yhem_a_2304486_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. The results of antiplatelet autoantibodies (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.
![Figure 8. The results of antiplatelet autoantibodies (%) stratified with respect to platelet count achieved at the 12-month time point, divided into two groups – PLT ≥ 100 and PLT < 100 × 109 /L.](/cms/asset/f0e64720-8b7b-4a18-af07-bed56beed05c/yhem_a_2304486_f0008_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Summary of statistical analysis of our data: Comparison with use of the T – test or Mann – Whitney test according to normality of the analyzed data comparing patients divided into two groups, responders (PLT ≥ 100 × 109 /L) and nonresponders (PLT < 100 × 109/L).
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.