Figures & data
Table 1. Comparison of basic clinical data between the MM and normal control groups [n (%) /M(P25-P75)]
Figure 1. Comparison of coagulation function indicators in different DS stages; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 1. Comparison of coagulation function indicators in different DS stages; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/b1dd4f13-bcfd-42fa-9cfd-fce3ed7a6641/yhem_a_2377849_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Comparison of results of coagulation function indicators in different DS stages [n /M(P25–P75)].
Figure 2. Comparison of results of coagulation function indicators for different ISS stages. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 2. Comparison of results of coagulation function indicators for different ISS stages. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/d21792da-595b-4896-bb4b-8857c316d451/yhem_a_2377849_f0002_ob.jpg)
Table 3. Comparison of results of coagulation function indicators in different ISS stages [n /M(P25–P75)].
Table 4. Correlation of β2-MG with PT, APTT, FIB, TT, FDP, and D-D.
Figure 3. Comparison of coagulation function indicators for different M protein types. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 3. Comparison of coagulation function indicators for different M protein types. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/5f67d68c-68c2-4320-9dbe-1f85d6fb98f3/yhem_a_2377849_f0003_ob.jpg)
Table 5. Coagulation function indicator levels for different M protein types [n /M(P25-P75)].