Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Taibah University for Science Volume 12, 2018 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,558
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Exact solitary wave solution for the fractional and classical GEW-Burgers equations: an application of Kudryashov method

R. I. NuruddeenDepartment of Mathematics, Federal University Dutse, Dutse, NigeriaORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5321-1958
ORCID Icon &
Aminu M. NassDepartment of Mathematics, University of Hafar Al Batin, Hafar Al-Batin, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence[email protected]
[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6672-5835
ORCID Icon
Pages 309-314 | Received 19 Nov 2017, Accepted 20 Mar 2018, Published online: 09 May 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 2,4.

Figure 1. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20(20) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 2,4.

Figure 2. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 6,8.

Figure 2. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20(20) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 6,8.

Figure 3. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 10,12.

Figure 3. 3D solitary wave profile of (Equation20(20) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1, and n = 10,12.

Figure 4. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation25) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 2,4.

Figure 4. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation25(25) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 2,4.

Figure 5. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation24) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 6,8.

Figure 5. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation24(24) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 6,8.

Figure 6. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation24) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 10,12.

Figure 6. 3D solitary wave profile of Equation (Equation24(24) ) when , d = 1.5, c = 1 and n = 10,12.

Figure 7. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 7. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 8. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 8. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 9. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 9. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 10. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Figure 10. Comparison between our solution and Hamdi et al. solution at , c = 1, d = 1.5, , t = 1.8, k = 0.45.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.