1,030
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of the anticorrosion performance of Tamsulosin as corrosion inhibitor for pipeline steel in acidic environment: experimental and theoretical study

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 288-299 | Received 06 Jun 2021, Accepted 27 Feb 2022, Published online: 14 Mar 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Molecular and (b) 3D ball and stick structures of TAM.

Figure 1. (a) Molecular and (b) 3D ball and stick structures of TAM.

Table 1. Comparison of the inhibitive performance of TAM with other reported drug corrosion inhibitors.

Figure 2. Variation of (a) CR and (b) ηWL% of TAM with inhibitor concentration in 1 M HCl at various temperatures.

Figure 2. Variation of (a) CR and (b) ηWL% of TAM with inhibitor concentration in 1 M HCl at various temperatures.

Figure 3. Plot of logCR versus 1/T for St52 steel corrosion in 1M HCl and inhibited solutions at various concentrations of TAM.

Figure 3. Plot of log⁡CR versus 1/T for St52 steel corrosion in 1M HCl and inhibited solutions at various concentrations of TAM.

Figure 4. Plot of logCR/T versus 1/T for corrosion of St52 steel in 1 M HCl and solution and inhibited solutions at different concentrations of TAM.

Figure 4. Plot of log⁡CR/T versus 1/T for corrosion of St52 steel in 1 M HCl and solution and inhibited solutions at different concentrations of TAM.

Table 2. Computed Ea values and thermodynamics parameters for St52 steel corrosion in 1 M HCl solution without and with various TAM concentrations.

Figure 5. (a) Nyquist, (b) phase angle and (c) Bode modulus plots of St52 steel in 1M HCl without and in different concentrations of TAM.

Figure 5. (a) Nyquist, (b) phase angle and (c) Bode modulus plots of St52 steel in 1M HCl without and in different concentrations of TAM.

Table 3. Impedance data for St52 steel in 1M HCl and with various concentrations TAM at 303 K.

Figure 6. (a) Open circuit potential and (b) polarization curves of St52 steel in1 M HCl and in the presence of different TAM concentrations.

Figure 6. (a) Open circuit potential and (b) polarization curves of St52 steel in1 M HCl and in the presence of different TAM concentrations.

Figure 7. SEM/EDX images of St52 steel surface in (a) 1 M HCl without and (b) with 2.0 × 10−3 M of TAM.

Figure 7. SEM/EDX images of St52 steel surface in (a) 1 M HCl without and (b) with 2.0 × 10−3 M of TAM.

Table 4. Polarization data for St52 steel corrosion in 1.5 M HCl in the absence and presence of TAM.

Figure 8. Langmuir isotherm plots for TAM’s adsorption on St52 steel surface at various temperatures.

Figure 8. Langmuir isotherm plots for TAM’s adsorption on St52 steel surface at various temperatures.

Table 5. Langmuir adsorption isotherm data for TAM at various temperatures.

Figure 9. Spatial adsorption interactions of TAM on St52 steel surface.

Figure 9. Spatial adsorption interactions of TAM on St52 steel surface.

Figure 10. Systematic and staggered arrangement of TAM on St52 steel surface.

Figure 10. Systematic and staggered arrangement of TAM on St52 steel surface.

Figure 11. The FMO density distribution of HOMO and LUMO of neutral and protonated TAM.

Figure 11. The FMO density distribution of HOMO and LUMO of neutral and protonated TAM.

Table 6. DFT parameters for neutral (TAM) and protonated (TAM-H+) form of the inhibitor.