847
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Aircraft observation of cloud microphysical characteristics of pre-stratiform-cloud precipitation in Jiangxi Province

&
Pages 364-371 | Received 24 May 2017, Accepted 27 May 2017, Published online: 06 Jul 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Instruments and parameters.

Figure 1. Radar PPI Plan-position indicator at Ganzhou on 11 November 2015: (a) 09:33 LT; (b) 10:46 LT; (c) 11:31 LT; (d) 11:42 LT. (e) Radar range–height indicator at 10:57 LT 11 November 2015 in Ganzhou.

Figure 1. Radar PPI Plan-position indicator at Ganzhou on 11 November 2015: (a) 09:33 LT; (b) 10:46 LT; (c) 11:31 LT; (d) 11:42 LT. (e) Radar range–height indicator at 10:57 LT 11 November 2015 in Ganzhou.

Figure 2. (a) Two-dimensional aircraft flight path. (b) Three-dimensional aircraft flight path. (c) Height changes over time (11 November 2015). The letters and numbers represent the process of different sectors.

Figure 2. (a) Two-dimensional aircraft flight path. (b) Three-dimensional aircraft flight path. (c) Height changes over time (11 November 2015). The letters and numbers represent the process of different sectors.

Figure 3. (a–c) Particle concentration and liquid water content change with height for (a) CAS, (b) CIP, and (c) PIP. (d) CAS spectral distribution at different heights in ascending section. (e) CIP–PIP spectral distribution at different heights in ascending section; the diameter range is 100–6300 μm. (f–h) Ratio of the number of particles of different scales to the total concentration at different heights for (f) CAS, (g) CIP, and (h) PIP.

Figure 3. (a–c) Particle concentration and liquid water content change with height for (a) CAS, (b) CIP, and (c) PIP. (d) CAS spectral distribution at different heights in ascending section. (e) CIP–PIP spectral distribution at different heights in ascending section; the diameter range is 100–6300 μm. (f–h) Ratio of the number of particles of different scales to the total concentration at different heights for (f) CAS, (g) CIP, and (h) PIP.

Figure 4. (a) Leg3 CIP two-dimensional particle images at different heights in ascending section: (a1)10:22:15 LT, 4750 m, −1.5 °C; (a2)10:19:59 LT, 4350 m, 1.2 °C; (a3) 10:19:16 LT, 4250 m, 1.5 °C; (a4) 10:18:44 LT, 4150 m, 2.02 °C. (b) Percentage of particle numbers per shape in ascending section (leg3) for CIP.

Figure 4. (a) Leg3 CIP two-dimensional particle images at different heights in ascending section: (a1)10:22:15 LT, 4750 m, −1.5 °C; (a2)10:19:59 LT, 4350 m, 1.2 °C; (a3) 10:19:16 LT, 4250 m, 1.5 °C; (a4) 10:18:44 LT, 4150 m, 2.02 °C. (b) Percentage of particle numbers per shape in ascending section (leg3) for CIP.