Advanced search
Publication Cover
Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters Volume 10, 2017 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
517
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

New approach to incorporating the impacts of non-hydrostatic perturbations in atmospheric models

Fa-Bo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China;College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Beijing, China
,
Bin WangState Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China;Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Center of Earth System Science (CESS), Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Li-Juan LiState Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
Pages 379-384 | Received 05 Feb 2017, Accepted 02 Jun 2017, Published online: 11 Jul 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of uh at the mid-layer of the atmosphere under different model resolutions: (a) 160 km; (b) 40 km; (c) 10 km.

Note: Blue: E1; Red: E2.
Figure 1. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of uh at the mid-layer of the atmosphere under different model resolutions: (a) 160 km; (b) 40 km; (c) 10 km.

Figure 2. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of wh at the mid-layer of the atmosphere under different model resolutions: (a) 160 km; (b) 40 km; (c) 10 km.

Note: Blue: E1; Red: E2.
Figure 2. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of wh at the mid-layer of the atmosphere under different model resolutions: (a) 160 km; (b) 40 km; (c) 10 km.

Figure 3. Framework of the approach.

Note: H: hydrostatic; NH: non-hydrostatic.
Figure 3. Framework of the approach.

Figure 4. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of um at the mid-layer of the atmosphere.

Note: Blue: E1; Red: E2.
Figure 4. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of um at the mid-layer of the atmosphere.

Figure 5. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of wm at the mid-layer of the atmosphere.

Note: Blue: E1; Red: E2.
Figure 5. Temporal evolution of the relative numerical error of wm at the mid-layer of the atmosphere.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.