322
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Adaptive socio-economic design approach for schooling systems in Egypt’s poorest areas (an applied project)

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 153-178 | Received 01 Nov 2023, Accepted 31 Dec 2023, Published online: 31 Jan 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Poverty and acute poverty according to regions. Upper Egypt rural has the highest ratio. CAPMAS latest update [Citation3].

Figure 1. Poverty and acute poverty according to regions. Upper Egypt rural has the highest ratio. CAPMAS latest update [Citation3].

Figure 2. Number and locations of the poorest rural villages in Egypt. [Citation3] CAPMAS latest update, analyzed by the authors.

Figure 2. Number and locations of the poorest rural villages in Egypt. [Citation3] CAPMAS latest update, analyzed by the authors.

Table 1. Basic ratios of children’s learning and schools’ situation in upper Egypt till 2023.

Table 2. Egypt’s SDG 2030 (regarding poverty and education), followed by analyzing the current status by the author.

Figure 3. The study's methodology main aspects by the author.

Figure 3. The study's methodology main aspects by the author.

Table 3. Factors of socio-economic adaptability in building environment. Illustrated by the author.

Figure 4. Child's psychological–physiological development elements and its relation to school zones [Citation17,Citation18]. Summarized and arranged by the author.

Figure 4. Child's psychological–physiological development elements and its relation to school zones [Citation17,Citation18]. Summarized and arranged by the author.

Figure 5. A map of Upper Egypt [Citation19], locating the project's main targeted locations.

Figure 5. A map of Upper Egypt [Citation19], locating the project's main targeted locations.

Table 4. The project’s basic design data. By the author.

Figure 6. The educational unit's assembly/construction phases. By author.

Figure 6. The educational unit's assembly/construction phases. By author.

Figure 7. The assembled unit's combined design layout. Designed by author.

Figure 7. The assembled unit's combined design layout. Designed by author.

Figure 8. The assembled unit's analyzed masterplan. Designed by author.

Figure 8. The assembled unit's analyzed masterplan. Designed by author.

Figure 9. Single class unit's layout. Designed by author.

Figure 9. Single class unit's layout. Designed by author.

Figure 10. Unit’s south facade. Designed by author.

Figure 10. Unit’s south facade. Designed by author.

Figure 11. Unit’s north facade. Designed by author.

Figure 11. Unit’s north facade. Designed by author.

Figure 12. Unit’s side facade. Designed by author.

Figure 12. Unit’s side facade. Designed by author.

Figure 13. A shape of recycled units that can be designed in the outdoor play area for age 6 to 9 years old.

Figure 13. A shape of recycled units that can be designed in the outdoor play area for age 6 to 9 years old.

Figure 14. Unit 1 (late childhood classroom), by author.

Figure 14. Unit 1 (late childhood classroom), by author.

Figure 15. Unit 2 (middle childhood classroom), by author.

Figure 15. Unit 2 (middle childhood classroom), by author.

Figure 16. Assembled units fabrication, transportation and installation phases. Arranged by the author.

Figure 16. Assembled units fabrication, transportation and installation phases. Arranged by the author.

Figure 17. The classroom unit's main zoning with illustrated section line (A-A). By author.

Figure 17. The classroom unit's main zoning with illustrated section line (A-A). By author.

Figure 18. Sustainability and Eco-system integration elements of the classroom unit. Designed by the author.

Figure 18. Sustainability and Eco-system integration elements of the classroom unit. Designed by the author.

Table 5. Assessing the adaptive, socio-economic and physiological-psychological elements of the project. The result by the author.