Figures & data
Figure 3. Variation of the sensitivity coefficient st with η and r when (a) τq/τa = 0.5 and (b) τq/τa = 0.8.
![Figure 3. Variation of the sensitivity coefficient st with η and r when (a) τq/τa = 0.5 and (b) τq/τa = 0.8.](/cms/asset/bdf86cc8-3461-42f4-a4c2-113d4e810e5e/gipe_a_10050968_f0003.gif)
Figure 6. Variation of the sensitivity coefficient st with η and r when (a) τq/τa = 0.5 and (b) τq/τa = 0.8.
![Figure 6. Variation of the sensitivity coefficient st with η and r when (a) τq/τa = 0.5 and (b) τq/τa = 0.8.](/cms/asset/27846f82-8905-403f-b42f-3168996e4b83/gipe_a_10050968_f0006.gif)
Figure 8. Variation of the standard deviation at and near its estimated optimum value of SD = 0.0007474 m as τt or τq changes.
![Figure 8. Variation of the standard deviation at and near its estimated optimum value of SD = 0.0007474 m as τt or τq changes.](/cms/asset/5400dd98-9347-420b-b342-032eaad8d13d/gipe_a_10050968_f0008.gif)
Figure 9. A comparison of the measured and estimated values of dimensionless phase front when (a) T0 = 89.0°C, (b)T0 = 80.3°C, (c) T0 = 71.6°C, and (d) T0 = 64.2°C.
![Figure 9. A comparison of the measured and estimated values of dimensionless phase front when (a) T0 = 89.0°C, (b)T0 = 80.3°C, (c) T0 = 71.6°C, and (d) T0 = 64.2°C.](/cms/asset/e1d98d5c-2585-465b-8174-626ee3ce953d/gipe_a_10050968_f0010.gif)
Figure 11. A comparison of the predicted temperature with the experimentally acquired data when T0 = 86°C.
![Figure 11. A comparison of the predicted temperature with the experimentally acquired data when T0 = 86°C.](/cms/asset/7876d257-cc10-4615-8a04-ed4f8d3c042d/gipe_a_10050968_f0012.gif)
Table
Table