Figures & data
Figure 4. True image, initial guess and final level set reconstruction for the situation of two objects close to each other.
![Figure 4. True image, initial guess and final level set reconstruction for the situation of two objects close to each other.](/cms/asset/b3de3f4b-b591-4291-8d08-3c1ca31dfc9e/gipe_a_126398_fig0004.gif)
Figure 10. Comparison of level set reconstructions with pixel-based Gauss–Newton reconstructions for ERT experimental data. The left column shows the real objects, the central column the pixel-based reconstructions, and the right column the shape-based reconstructions using level sets.
![Figure 10. Comparison of level set reconstructions with pixel-based Gauss–Newton reconstructions for ERT experimental data. The left column shows the real objects, the central column the pixel-based reconstructions, and the right column the shape-based reconstructions using level sets.](/cms/asset/ecfeac5f-186b-4894-8bec-672110ea95fc/gipe_a_126398_fig0010.gif)
Figure 11. Comparison of level set reconstructions with pixel-based Gauss–Newton reconstructions for ECT experimental data. The region of interest is the interior of the pipe. The left column shows the real objects, the central column the pixel-based reconstructions, and the right column the shape-based reconstructions using level sets.
![Figure 11. Comparison of level set reconstructions with pixel-based Gauss–Newton reconstructions for ECT experimental data. The region of interest is the interior of the pipe. The left column shows the real objects, the central column the pixel-based reconstructions, and the right column the shape-based reconstructions using level sets.](/cms/asset/1d99b0da-4fa7-41a3-95cb-da9270d06d83/gipe_a_126398_fig0011.gif)