Figures & data
Figure 1. Flow chart of the damage detection method using incomplete static responses and LS-SVM.
Figure 2. The plane bridge with the finite element model.
Table 1. Obtained hyperparameters for plane steel bridge with different sample numbers.
Table 2. Statistics for training and testing for plane steel bridge with different sample numbers.
Figure 3. Results for three damage patterns of the plane steel bridge with fewer samples for training.
Figure 4. Results for three damage patterns of the plane steel bridge.
Figure 5. Comparison of the results of the methods for damage detection for the plane steel bridge.
Figure 6. The four-span continuous beam with the finite element model.
Table 3. Obtained hyperparameters for the four-span continuous beam.
Table 4. Statistics for training and testing for four-span continuous beam.
Figure 7. Results for three damage patterns of the four-span continuous beam.
Figure 8. The four-storey plane frame with finite element model.
Table 5. Obtained hyperparameters for four-storey frame.
Table 6. Statistics for training and testing for four-storey frame.
Figure 9. Results for three damage patterns of the four-storey plane steel frame.
Table 7. Statistics for training and testing for four-storey plane steel frame using fewer master DOFs.
Figure 10. Results for three damage patterns of the four-storey plane steel frame using fewer master DOFs.
