503
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Numerical solution of two-dimensional inverse force function in the wave equation with nonlocal boundary conditions

&
Pages 1743-1767 | Received 09 Jul 2016, Accepted 08 Jan 2017, Published online: 09 Feb 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Local support domains for an arbitrary nodal point xi for two-dimensional hypothesis domain.

Figure 1. Local support domains for an arbitrary nodal point xi for two-dimensional hypothesis domain.

Figure 2. Considered domains in the current paper.

Figure 2. Considered domains in the current paper.

Figure 3. uapprox and ε(u) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 3. uapprox and ε∞(u) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 4. The exact solutions {r(t),u(x,0.5,T)} in comparison with the regularized numerical solutions for N=625, δt=0.01, σ{1,2,3}% and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 4. The exact solutions {r(t),u(x,0.5,T)} in comparison with the regularized numerical solutions for N=625, δt=0.01, σ∈{1,2,3}% and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 5. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=121, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 5. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=121, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 1.

Figure 6. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a) and (b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c) and (d) in the case of no regularization and N=441, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω2 for Example 1.

Figure 6. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a) and (b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c) and (d) in the case of no regularization and N=441, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω2 for Example 1.

Figure 7. uapprox (left) and ε(u) (right) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Figure 7. uapprox (left) and ε∞(u) (right) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Table 1. Numerical results of absolute errors and relative errors on [0,1]2 with N=529, δt=0.02, T=1 and condition number 5.5427×103 for Example 1.

Table 2. Numerical results of absolute errors, relative errors and condition numbers on [0,1]2 with σ=1% and T=1 for Example 1.

Figure 8. Graphs of absolute errors r(t) and u(xyT) using the SMRPI with σ{0,3,5}%, N{121,225,441,625,1089,1849,2209}, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Figure 8. Graphs of absolute errors r(t) and u(x, y, T) using the SMRPI with σ∈{0,3,5}%, N∈{121,225,441,625,1089,1849,2209}, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Figure 9. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=2209, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Figure 9. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=2209, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 2.

Figure 10. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a,b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c,d) in the case of no regularization and N=441, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω1 for Example 2.

Figure 10. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a,b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c,d) in the case of no regularization and N=441, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω1 for Example 2.

Table 3. Numerical results of absolute errors and relative errors on [0,1]2 with N=1849, δt=0.02, T=1 and condition number 4.7605×104 for Example 2.

Figure 11. uapprox (left) and ε(u) (right) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 11. uapprox (left) and ε∞(u) (right) profiles for different noise levels with N=625, δt=0.01 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 12. Graphs of relative errors r(t) and u(xyT) using the SMRPI with σ{0,3,5}%, N{121,225,441,625,1089,1681}, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 12. Graphs of relative errors r(t) and u(x, y, T) using the SMRPI with σ∈{0,3,5}%, N∈{121,225,441,625,1089,1681}, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 13. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=441, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 13. Condition number and regularization parameter values for k=1:T/δt¯ with N=441, δt=0.02 and T=1 on [0,1]2 for Example 3.

Figure 14. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a,b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c,d) in the case of no regularization and N=2209, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω3 for Example 3.

Figure 14. Graphs of approximate solution and absolute error of u(x,t) (a,b) with approximate solution and absolute error of r(t) (c,d) in the case of no regularization and N=2209, δt=0.01 and T=1 on domain Ω3 for Example 3.

Table 4. Numerical results of absolute errors with no regularization and T=1, on irregular domains Ω1, Ω2 and Ω3 for Example 2.

Table 5. Numerical results of absolute errors and relative errors on [0,1]2 with N=2209, δt=0.02, T=1 and condition number 2.8050×104 for Example 3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.