538
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fatigue dynamic reliability and global sensitivity analysis of double random vibration system based on Kriging model

, , , &
Pages 1648-1667 | Received 16 Sep 2019, Accepted 22 Apr 2020, Published online: 14 May 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. The flowchart of the ALK method.

Figure 1. The flowchart of the ALK method.

Figure 2. The dynamic reliabilities with different sample numbers calculated by MCS method.

Figure 2. The dynamic reliabilities with different sample numbers calculated by MCS method.

Figure 3. The maximum ERF values at the training points by ALK method in iteration history (ν=0.2).

Figure 3. The maximum ERF values at the training points by ALK method in iteration history (ν=0.2).

Figure 4. The true values of training points by ALK method in iteration history (ν=0.2).

Figure 4. The true values of training points by ALK method in iteration history (ν=0.2).

Table 1. The dynamic reliabilities of the bar under two conditions.

Figure 5. The GSA indices of variables of bar by MCS and ALK methods.

Figure 5. The GSA indices of variables of bar by MCS and ALK methods.

Figure 6. The dynamic reliabilities with different coefficients of variation.

Figure 6. The dynamic reliabilities with different coefficients of variation.

Figure 7. The schematic diagram of 16-bar structure.

Figure 7. The schematic diagram of 16-bar structure.

Table 2. The dynamic reliabilities of 16-bar structure with different t.

Figure 8. The GSA indices of variables of 16-bar structure by MCS and ALK methods.

Figure 8. The GSA indices of variables of 16-bar structure by MCS and ALK methods.

Figure 9. The schematic diagram of air pipe with random variation excitations.

Figure 9. The schematic diagram of air pipe with random variation excitations.

Table 3. The input random variables of air pipe.

Figure 10. The acceleration spectrum of PSD.

Figure 10. The acceleration spectrum of PSD.

Figure 11. The GSA indices of variables of air pipe by MCS and ALK methods.

Figure 11. The GSA indices of variables of air pipe by MCS and ALK methods.

Table 4. The dynamic reliabilities and GSA indices of air pipe.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.