Figures & data
Figure 1. (A) Morphology of graphene nanomaterial in a TEM image; (B) Morphology of a PCL and PCL/G filament cross-section; yellow arrows: graphene nanomaterials in PCL/G.
![Figure 1. (A) Morphology of graphene nanomaterial in a TEM image; (B) Morphology of a PCL and PCL/G filament cross-section; yellow arrows: graphene nanomaterials in PCL/G.](/cms/asset/e072cc7b-fedc-49be-a340-8d16e80aad8b/inan_a_2027036_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum analysis. (a) PCL (b) PCL/G (c) Graphene nanomaterials. Yellow arrow: increased peaks.
![Figure 2. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum analysis. (a) PCL (b) PCL/G (c) Graphene nanomaterials. Yellow arrow: increased peaks.](/cms/asset/f0f464e0-2130-44d8-b9e9-24c30b7bae0a/inan_a_2027036_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 4. (A) Elastic modulus; (B) Ultimate strength; (C) Yield strain; and (D) Typical stress-strain curves of PCL and PCL/G. Mechanical strength significantly improved in the PCL/G group. *p< 0.05, ***p< 0.001 compared to PCL.
![Figure 4. (A) Elastic modulus; (B) Ultimate strength; (C) Yield strain; and (D) Typical stress-strain curves of PCL and PCL/G. Mechanical strength significantly improved in the PCL/G group. *p< 0.05, ***p< 0.001 compared to PCL.](/cms/asset/499aa8a0-23d2-4e39-8cd7-bc5593ea5bde/inan_a_2027036_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. (A) Live/dead stain of two different cell scaffolds at 3 and 7 days. (B) WST-1 cell viability of cell scaffolds at 3 and 7 days. ***p< 0.001 compared to PCL.
![Figure 5. (A) Live/dead stain of two different cell scaffolds at 3 and 7 days. (B) WST-1 cell viability of cell scaffolds at 3 and 7 days. ***p< 0.001 compared to PCL.](/cms/asset/9887a222-90ee-47d6-92be-ebde1c169f47/inan_a_2027036_f0005_c.jpg)